Allowing Women To Drive Would Mean No More Virgins, Says Saudi Religious Council

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
5,982
Daps
132,705
Look at you, emotional. :whew: Ima chill though cuz i know you keep the report post button on deck for responses that hurt your feelings :russ:

The only abuse I would like to report is the crime against humanity that crackhead barber you paid $2 for an edge up committed on your hairline. Send that motherfukker to the Hague.
 

50CentStan

Allahu Akbar
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
23,439
Reputation
3,055
Daps
74,743
Reppin
The Ummah!
U must not know how bad Saudi men drive, now imagine Saudi women driving...they would all die in accidents and be no women left.
 

Serious

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
79,919
Reputation
14,208
Daps
190,251
Reppin
1st Round Playoff Exits
:ohhh: I got mixed feeling on this one, I partially agree with mowgli's statement. Without being biased, anyone can logically deduct that granting women more rights will indirectly lead to the emergence of a more promiscuous / sexually liberated society :manny:.

Which I'm all for, I don't condone restricting "natural" human rights.

Plus let's not act like the royal families don't dabble in extra-martial affairs.

At the of end the we're all human. We all have sexual needs, and simply repenting them as sins does no justice.

25 Years Later - The 'death Of A Princess' Controversy | Death Of A Princess | FRONTLINE | PBS


This line is completely infallible though:
Saudi Arabia is currently considering a law for women to cover up their eyes if they are deemed too "tempting."

The SouthEast Region need clearly needs to become more science literate and sexually liberated.


:ohhh:

Point blank that prof, is a fakkit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
103,060
Reputation
13,348
Daps
243,143
:ohhh: I got mixed feeling on this one, I partially agree with mowgli's statement. Without being biased, anyone can logically deduct that granting women more rights will indirectly lead to the emergence of a more promiscuous / sexually liberated society :manny:.

Which I'm all for, I don't condone restricting "natural" human rights.

Plus let's not act like the royal families don't dabble in extra-martial affairs.

At the of end the we're all human. We all have sexual needs, and simply repenting them as sins does no justice.

25 Years Later - The 'death Of A Princess' Controversy | Death Of A Princess | FRONTLINE | PBS


This line is completely infallible though:


The SouthEast Region need clearly needs to become more science literate and sexually liberated.

Are YOU Socially Intelligent? Daniel Goleman - Social Intelligence - YouTube
:ohhh:

Point blank that prof, is a fakkit.

They see the relationship between cars and extramarital issues in their nation. Its a logical relationship and it will tear apart familes unfortunately but that said, women should be able to drive. But also, its their country and their crime rate is lower then the united states. I guess its better to have more mayhem as long as you have the perception of freedom from a western standpoint. They dont see it that way. They havnt learned how to turn mayhem into a profit like Europeans have. :yeshrug:
 

Serious

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
79,919
Reputation
14,208
Daps
190,251
Reppin
1st Round Playoff Exits
They havnt learned how to turn mayhem into a profit like Europeans have. :yeshrug:

That's like saying it's a conspiracy to let women be society liberated. Even cats in the 1% get screwed over from divorce in modern times, despite the origin of marriage being a vital source of maintaining status quo of society and wealth / power among certain bloodlines.


And :smh: Saudi Arabia does make a profit off of keeping their people in the dark. For example, Bin Laden's family was part of the elite in Saudi Arabia. Every construction contract throughout the country, had to be done under their chain of command.

Saudi Binladin Group - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
103,060
Reputation
13,348
Daps
243,143
That's like saying it's a conspiracy to let women be society liberated. Even cats in the 1% get screwed over from divorce in modern times, despite the origin of marriage being a vital source of maintaining status quo of society and wealth / power among certain bloodlines.


And :smh: Saudi Arabia does make a profit off of keeping their people in the dark. For example, Bin Laden's family was part of the elite in Saudi Arabia. Every construction contract throughout the country, had to be done under their chain of command.

Saudi Binladin Group - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What im saying is people have different ways of making money off of the woes of their people. By mayhem i mean criminal activity. In America crime is promoted to assist businesses in making money off taxpayers for prison owners. Crime in Saudi Arabia isnt as rampant as it is in the US. There is less infidelity in Saudi Arabia. There is less divorce there. Obviously a nation that restricts their people is going to want to maintain that status quo even if their methods are heavy handed. Its a new set of problems that they arent going to want to deal with, like white people making sure minorities recieve great public education. :jawalrus:
 

RadaMillz

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
11,255
Reputation
2,440
Daps
57,064
Reppin
Harlem, Uganda
I may not agree with his stance but I respect saudi arabia for refusing to bow to those against their culture and ways. They should always speak their mind and remain true to their beliefs regardless of Western mockery.
 
Top