All you c00ns caping for Cliven Bundy get in here right now

[714562]

1. The letter of the law is against him because he broke the law when you break the law what happens?
2. He's racist and I don't care for his struggles, any struggles he may have had, grazing on the land.

The next time a self-described black militant goes to jail, I will respond with these arguments.

1. He broke the law. So fukk him.
2. He hates white people. So I don't care.

 

[No_bammer_weed]

This whole paleoconservative militia movement is all about trying to recreate antebellum southern America where the ******s were slaves, before the Jew-run mainstream media and banking system, and when cacs were free to run around shooting people.

That's why these dudes are supposedly so anti-government and they bytch all day about Ruby Ridge and Waco (both of which the people who were killed were breaking the law), but you will never hear a peep from them about Fred Hampton, Assata Shakur, or the countless incidents of police brutality and targeted murders and terrorism inflictedon blacks by the government. fukk em.

We dont even have to reach back 40-50 years to examples entangled in the black power movement, to reveal how easily conservative america dispatches unambiguous positions of white supremacy. There are impossible to avoid examples in the last couple of years:

Statistical data exposed that Stop and Frisk resulted in blatant constitutional violations of NY citizens as ruled by the district court. Problem for conservatives was that these citizens whom were violated werent white. Not only did conservatives show a disinterest in American constitutional rights --- they argued that the constitution was IRRELEVANT to the policy, and that some murky notion of "safety" should supersede all.

Early in the trayvon saga, sharp commentators fenced in the events as a violation of Trayvon's constitutional rights: Travyon was a free citizen, gunned down, with government agency deciding unilaterally that the killing was not fit for trial, rather than opening justice to its citizens and a jury of its peers. Again, conservatives uniformly argued on behalf of government over "liberty".

I dont even have to delve into the abstract conceptualizations conservatives dispatch to enshrine and enforce white supremacy, which is woven into the fabric of the ideology and the country at large. Cant a week go by without conservatives making some sort of causal link to welfare and plantations, and this underpinning that "black culture" is the root cause for negative inner city outcomes, which of course exist independent of 400 years of abusive legislation, policy, and decontextualization from the social contract of which blacks have been privileged to experience. Im still waiting for a spike in the unemployment rate to be met with arguments that white culture has a dodgy work ethic, or the indexed county in kentucky with the largest users of snap per capita (hint it aint an inner city black area) is likened to Euro surfs under a self-governed feudalistic mindset.

Who is going to have the balls to firmly argue that a prominent and powerful wing of our socio-political life subscribes that darker melanin = violent/lazy/unintelligent/useless ....not isolated incidents, but an actual belief system.

 

[CACtain Planet]

liberals are the master race baiters. It's disgusting how easily they can control black folk with a few "racist" allegations thrown here and there.

yeap and I noticed this guy @Victorvonc00n or @Mephistopheles or whatever the fukk he was called yesterday loves stirring the pot with these type of stories.. he did it with the Duck Dynasty preacher as well..glad the mods caught on to his shtick and threw this shyt in the free speech bushes

 

[714562]

Actually, this thread is a prime example of why the right needs to disentangle the concepts of state rights and individual rights from the historical racist narrative.

Because as long as that narrative exists, people can cry "racist" at anyone standing up to the federal government.

 

[Robbie3000]

liberals are the master race baiters. It's disgusting how easily they can control black folk with a few "racist" allegations thrown here and there.

Shut up clown. It's disgusting how easily racists can control idiots by shouting a few insincere cries of freedom and liberty and sprinkling it calls for Limited Government. But you've proven yourself to be a clown over and over.

Went from cheering for Obama to Ron Paul to defending white bigots.

 

[tmonster]

I'm sure Bundy would protect a black man's right to mooch off government land and not pay taxes

the fukking irony is just *muah*

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

Shut up clown. It's disgusting how easily racists can control idiots by shouting a few insincere cries of freedom and liberty and sprinkling it calls for Limited Government. But you've proven yourself to be a clown over and over.

Went from cheering for Obama to Ron Paul to defending white bigots.

when are you going to speak on your Democratic pedo fukking fundraisers nikka?

 

[tmonster]

Actually, this thread is a prime example of why the right needs to disentangle the concepts of state rights and individual rights from the historical racist narrative.

Because as long as that narrative exists, people can cry "racist" at anyone standing up to the federal government.

I think with Obama in the white house, they view their state's rights concepts as a religio/racial concept pedigreed directly from the original concept of manifest destiny
just to give some background

 

[¯\_(ツ)_/¯]

I find it so hard to believe that people can just end the argument with "He lost in court." Black men often lose in court. Is that justice? There are much, much bigger socioeconomic forces at play here. For example:

1. The bias of an industrial economy against his lifestyle;
2 The purposeful, slow eradication of all ranchers in his county by the administrative state;
3. The fact that people like Cliven Bundy are essentially the face of poverty in the U.S. (as opposed to urban blacks).

Like, I legitimately disagree with you on a LOT of shyt, but I have to agree with you on this. Saying that the law is against Bundy and dropping the matter is beyond reductive.

This is why I hate liberals. They claim to be for poor rural cultures abroad, but when they're confronted with the face of poor, rural cultures in their own country, it DISGUSTS them.

It's not his land that he's grazing on.

The federal government is the one who own, controls, and manages the land that he's grazing on and they set the rules for anyone that is grazing on it.

Who's to stop someone from chasing/running off his cattle and having that same person say "it's my land he's trespassing on and I now I want to do whatever with it"?

Would that person be well within his rights to do so?

 

[Piff Perkins]

when are you going to speak on your Democratic pedo fukking fundraisers nikka?

Pedos are disgusting, and they need to be exposed. And it's a shame the media has never done an expose on the disgusting shyt that is going on there, ruining the lives of boys and girls.

There. As a liberal I have spoken out against the pedo fukking - something that the vast majority of people, be they liberal or conservative - can agree is disgusting and wrong.

So....how bout Bundy huh?

 

[714562]

It's not his land that he's grazing on.

The federal government is the one who own, controls, and manages the land that he's grazing on and they set the rules for anyone that is grazing on it.

Who's to stop someone from chasing/running off his cattle and having that same person say "it's my land he's trespassing on and I now I want to do whatever with it"?

Would that person be well within his rights to do so?

Broke the law! Broke the law, law, law!

Broke the law? Broke the law! Law law, Lawlawlwa.

I swear, you're like a Pokemon.

 

[Momentum]

White privilege = Cliven shouldn't have to pay for his grazing rights because he doesn't want to

Government asks him to pay bill? Nah don't pay that, get the guns. Murica!

 

[¯\_(ツ)_/¯]

Broke the law! Broke the law, law, law!

Broke the law? Broke the law! Law law, Lawlawlwa.

I swear, you're like a Pokemon.

Okay ignore my comments about him breaking the law.

That's 170,000 acres of land he's using...who's protecting it?

And if Bundy doesn't acknowledge who the appropriate land owner is then why should anyone else that would want to remove/kill his cattle and claim the land?

 

[Fillerguy]

Hipsters dont identify as hipsters? Goth Dont identify as goth? black panthers dont identify as black panthers?? Skateboarders, bodybuilders???? How are they not minority groups as well when behavior is now an accepted criteria

Pleasure dont respond if you can't read. No where in my post did I say this was a defining characteristic of minority groups, nor did I fukking infer it; I was merely suggesting why a simp or hispter wouldn't be called a minority group based on the explains you gave. Give more.... but I refuse to get into an argument between a demographic and a minority just so we can bash gays in a c00n exposing thread

 

[714562]

Okay ignore my comments about him breaking the law.

That's 170,000 acres of land he's using...who's protecting it?

And if Bundy doesn't acknowledge who the appropriate land owner is then why should anyone else that would want to remove/kill his cattle and claim the land?

I've responded multiple times as to why the arguments of Bundy supporters have nothing to do with the letter of the law. You haven't responded to any of my points, but expect me to respond to yours. You're the one ignoring me.

Bundy doesn't acknowledge who the "appropriate" land owner is because he believes the current state of the law to be unjust. He's not an anarchist. He's not against the concept of law, and neither are any of his supporters.