absolutely hilarious...kk one of your studies has no abstract..why did you even post it..absolute prrof that you don't go through your articles before you post shyt
one of your articlse was from alternative medicines..didn't know they were recognized by the peer reviewed board bahahahahaha
three of your articles are anthrax vaccines..anthrax vaccines only have aluminum hydroxide..i think your confusing aluminum and aluminum hydroixde which are two different compounds. i thought our debate was based on vaccines for children..anthrax vaccines aren't part of the schedule but i definelty agree with you that those soldiers should be awarded by the phama companies major fukk up..but as i said..just because one vaccine has adverse effects doesn't mean all vaccines have adverse effects..just like if one car has faulty breaks doesn't mean all cars have faulty breaks
one of your article was authored by Mark Geier who has a history of being intellectually dishonnest.."Geier's credibility as an expert witness has been questioned in 10 court cases.[4] In 2003, a judge ruled that Geier presented himself as an expert witness in "areas for which he has no training, expertise and experience."[2] In other cases in which Geier has testified, judges have labeled his testimony "intellectually dishonest," "not reliable" and "wholly unqualified."[2] Another judge wrote that Geier "may be clever, but he is not credible."[5]
Geier's scientific work has also been criticized; when the Institute of Medicine reviewed vaccine safety in 2004, it dismissed Geier's work as seriously flawed, "uninterpretable", and marred by incorrect use of scientific terms.[2] In 2003, the American Academy of Pediatrics criticized one of Geier's studies, which claimed a link between vaccines and autism, as containing "numerous conceptual and scientific flaws, omissions of fact, inaccuracies, and misstatements."[6] New Scientist reported that the institutional review board which approved some of Geier's experiments with autistic children was located at Geier's business address and included Geier, his son and wife, a business partner of Geier's, and a plaintiff's lawyer involved in vaccine litigation.[7] In January 2007, a paper by the Geiers was retracted by the journal Autoimmunity Reviews.[3] Since 2011, Geier's medical license has been suspended or revoked in several states over concerns about his autism treatments"
two of your articles don't even mention vaccines..they just talk about adverse effects of thiomersal at higher quantities which i never denied
and i can bring up tons of studies that say the opposite of the whole autism thing including the one you posted a couple of pages ago bahahah!!but whats the point of posting them when you won't answer them or counter argue them
anyways i'm done with you ..i'm not answering any of your responses if you don't go throug MY arguments..its seems unfair that your responses are not related to my past arguments and are just random articles you found on the net