Your 1st and 3rd question are phrased so poorly, I cant even tell what they mean at all. Its almost like you're illiterate
My second comment speaks to your irrationality in claiming every banker that dies in the world being part of some massive, elaborate cover up but, at the same time, evidence of conspiracy is left on the internet in the form of job advertisements because clowns like me wouldn't question or investigate them. Pick one: either the disregard for the intelligence of the public is so massive that obvious evidence is left out online for anyone to see or these people are capable of going as far as murdering countless people in a desperate attempt to hide the truth coming out. You cannot just pick and choose which one it is when it is convenient for you. When you do that, literally every story can be used as evidence of your bullshyt.
"Still think AL-Q is taking your freedoms away"......................
Your 5th comment about Al Qaeda not existing is a real example of your fantasy.
It isnt a strawman because that is actually your argument. Im not cherrypicking. Im simply pointing out the inconsistencies in your logic.If anything, youre the one cherrypicking any evidence that vaguely supports your claims. Basically, absence of evidence is evidence and anything else is evidence too. Everything is evidence.1. The comment on the bankers was a straw-man attempt to push the subject into another matter. Not only what you are saying is false, it's inaccurate and childish at best. If you can debate me....call me out on everything instead of cherry-picking what you think is good for the conversation. Provide facts and evidence....you won't.
2. So it's my fantasy because you have a former head of a u.s. intelligence division saying it doesn't exist. Wow you have great sense of comprehension.
Address me when you can debate me. Until then....
It isnt a strawman because that is actually your argument. Im not cherrypicking. Im simply pointing out the inconsistencies in your logic.If anything, youre the one cherrypicking any evidence that vaguely supports your claims. Basically, absence of evidence is evidence and anything else is evidence too. Everything is evidence.
It just seems absurd to discount the mountains of evidence that Al qaeda exists because one man said so. Who knows what his motivations are? If what you are saying is correct, there must be tens, maybe even hundreds, of thousands of people in on it that know for a fact Al Qaeda doesnt exist given the size of the American defensive apparatus. Honestly, what is more likely? One man is lying for whatever reason or hundreds of thousands of people are involved in the same conspiracy? Occam's razor applies here.
Its like talking to a wall here because if one of these theories falls apart, your entire world view falls apart. You're pysche so tied into being "enlightened" that you cant tell that you're a joke. Educated people, that know much more about the world than you or I, laugh at you. Think about this.
Edit: at the guy in the video you posted talking about why al qaeda formed at 9:35.
Edit2: at you trying to give him more clout than he has by calling him head of intelligence
At you completely missing this guys point and being misled by a Youtube video title. the first nine minutes of the video talks about how we are being manipulated by israelis to intervene in the middle east and how our intervention within the middle east has created anti american sentiment within the region, leading to the formation of groups such as al qaeda. his point is that we dont have an ideological enemy that hates our freedom like idiots in this country say, but that they despise our meddling in their affairs. There is a ton of truth to what he is saying so I understand why you're trying to claim him but NOWHERE does he say Al Qaeda, as an organization, doesn't exist. He, in fact, reaffirms that they do exist exactly where I pointed out earlier. How could you even interpret this so badly? Its almost comical.1. You haven't provided any proof to your claims just alot of talk
2. Wahhabist exist, this terrorist network call Al-Q doesn't. If you want to know what these clowns are called....look at Saudi Arabia.
3. My theories don't fall apart b/c you haven't brought anything concert to the table.
4. It's nice that you listen to it by 9:35 but he addressed "The enemy doesn't exist" in the first minute.
5. Head Chief of the Bin Laden Unit.....hmmmm head of intelligence unit.
6. You totally ignored the first 9 mins of the video.
7. Plus everything he has said he come to pass.
At you completely missing this guys point and being misled by a Youtube video title. the first nine minutes of the video talks about how we are being manipulated by israelis to intervene in the middle east and how our intervention within the middle east has created anti american sentiment within the region, leading to the formation of groups such as al qaeda. his point is that we dont have an ideological enemy that hates our freedom like idiots in this country say, but that they despise our meddling in their affairs. There is a ton of truth to what he is saying so I understand why you're trying to claim him but NOWHERE does he say Al Qaeda, as an organization, doesn't exist. He, in fact, reaffirms that they do exist exactly where I pointed out earlier. How could you even interpret this so badly? Its almost comical.
missed the division part, my bad.
:Sigh: This is so tiresome. No where did I mislead what he is saying. Islamists were mentioned as the core group he was pointing across. Al-Q is mentioned as a metaphor for Islamists.
They're actors brehMeanwhile ISIS is stronger than ever and is now fighting the Iraqi army in Baghdad
Lol @ Al Qaeda still existing though
This should spark some widespread backlash against the American Military establishment and the Gov in general.... all that war and death and violence and these nikkas still laughing at us plotting our deaths.
What a joke.