Who tf yall be around? We got Geechees in Harlem. My mother's good friend is one from SC and her late 'friend' was one from GA.
Not really. They were brought here on the same boat as everybody else and got sold off like everybody else. The difference with them is that they were isolated away from the rest of us and therefore lack the native and European admixture that the rest of us share. They were also able, due to said isolation, to create (and maintain) a pidgin language based on whatever languages they spoke in Africa that survives until this very day.
Ie, my mother's people are from upcountry SC and do not descend FROM Geechees. However, we maintain some of the same hoodoo traditions and, if not the language itself, the accent. I spent a few afternoons with my great grandmother's sister and could only understand her bc I'd spent a good amount of time around certain WI's.
Hah???????Lol, I didn't say they weren't from the same boat or weren't sold or whatever you are trying to imply...
I will simplify by using an ethnographic and genetics approach...In any ethnic group, you always have many parent groups. The parent groups, are always the ones that came first and retained most of their original cultural traits and genetics. And, from the combined derivatives of these parent groups, you will obtain the different subsets that can make part of the minority or majority of the said ethnic group. No matter how these groups retained their traits and genetics, no matter their demographic numbers, their parentage still maintains. Plus, again, 1 ethnic group, can have multiple parent groups.
For example, if you go to Brazil, the Afro-Baianos, from Bahia state, where the famous city of Salvador is located, only represent 15% of the state's total population. The same applies to the Afro-Mineiros, from Minas Gerais, who are 9% of Minas Gerais total population. Both groups, at maximum, represent like 2% of Brazil's total population. But, both groups. although minorities, are not a subset of Afro-Brazilians in General. They are a superset, because they are some of the first groups to establish themselves as Afro-Brazilians. As a mix of the African, European and New World interactions. And because of that, it is through groups like them, how you obtain most of the regional Afro-Brazilian populations.
Attention, it is through groups like them, not only specifically them....
Or, an example right next to you...White Americans...You have whites from all over Europe who established themselves in the USA. But, the superset are groups like WASP. They were part of the ones who defined the broad white American identity and values, based on their cultural practices from Europe and the cultures they interacted during their transition to the New World.
Are they the only ones? No. You also have groups like German-Americans and Franco-Americans, that have been in the New World and what is now USA, for around the same time as WASPs.
More examples...If you go to Europe, the biggest minority all over are the Romanies, also called Gypsies. They are originally from India but, due to persecutions and mass slavery, ended up in Europe. Who were part of the first Romanies in Europe? The ones now living in places like Bulgaria, Romania, overall Eastern Europe. From these parent groups, you later obtain the Romanies from Portugal, Spain, Poland, Czech Republic, Germany etc. These same parent groups are responsible for establishing the first Romani-European identities. As people, that knew they came from India, and that from their dispersion and assimilation through Europe, created their different Romani-European cultures around Europe.
So, the same applies to the Gullah. They cannot be a subset in the Americas, because they are part of the first Afro-descendant groups to directly arrive and establish an in-group identity based on where they originally came from, on the Europeans they interacted with and the new land they established themselves. It doesn't mean that they are the only ones. But overall, they can't be a subset, only a superset.