After passing congestion pricing, NY's MTA wants to charge the NYC Marathon organizers to use the bridges.

No Homo

Superstar
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
17,705
Reputation
3,935
Daps
55,244
Reppin
Jigga with the Roley and the Vest
But the Road Runners have pushed back, arguing the MTA enjoys increased revenue from greater transit ridership during marathon week that “more than makes up” for any lost toll revenue from the bridge. The Verrazzano-Narrows Bridge connects the New York City boroughs of Brooklyn and Staten Island, and is named after the first European explorer to sail into the New York Harbor.


The organization also noted that the 2019 marathon generated an estimated $427 million for the city, significantly boosting tourism, tax revenues and the economy, according to an economic impact report it commissioned in 2020.



And they want more than that..every penny...Strong armed robbery is what the MTA is trying to do. :francis:
 

concise

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
38,963
Reputation
3,388
Daps
94,677
Completely different issue from congestion pricing. They’re shutting down a bridge and the MTA is losing toll revenue. They should have to pay for that.


Well, they also run over the 59th Street Bridge as well so when that toll activates, they need to add the cost of that also.


I guess you'd also agree those 5th Avenue parades should pay also ... since they're blocking that soon to be toll road and that would also cause them to lose revenue. :laugh:
 

AtomicUse

Superstar
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
6,509
Reputation
2,765
Daps
36,107
In Chicago, if they have an event where the parking meters on the street are blocked off or inaccessible and cars can’t park there, the City has to pay the private company that owns all of the cities parking meters the lost revenue from cars not being able to park there. The City charges a fee to whatever organization is responsible for shutting down the parking spots if it’s for an event, so it just like the MTA is doing the same thing that’s been happening here for over a decade.

:yeshrug:
 

WaveCapsByOscorp™

2021 Grammy Award Winner
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
18,895
Reputation
-441
Daps
44,768
Just when you thought it couldn’t get any more shyttier, here comes New York motherfukking shytty with another tax

:mjlol:
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,238
Reputation
8,032
Daps
151,823
Wait so they been shutting down the bridge for that bull shyt and not charging before?
:dead:

So a whole city gets inconvenienced and the city don't recoup by taxing?

WTF?

roads and bridges aren't subsidized completely by gas tax, every residents taxes pays for them for them whether they drive or not. runners shouldn't be taxed for using the bridge for a single event.
 

concise

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
38,963
Reputation
3,388
Daps
94,677
In Chicago, if they have an event where the parking meters on the street are blocked off or inaccessible and cars can’t park there, the City has to pay the private company that owns all of the cities parking meters the lost revenue from cars not being able to park there. The City charges a fee to whatever organization is responsible for shutting down the parking spots if it’s for an event, so it just like the MTA is doing the same thing that’s been happening here for over a decade.

:yeshrug:



:dead: Why doesn't the city of Chicago operate the meters? Why do they have to contract it out?
 

AtomicUse

Superstar
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
6,509
Reputation
2,765
Daps
36,107
:dead: Why doesn't the city of Chicago operate the meters? Why do they have to contract it out?
Back in 2008 when the recession hit, the mayor didn’t want to raise property taxes or fire teachers to plug the budget hole. So he worked with JP Morgan bank and Katten firm to sell all the parking meters on a 100 Year long lease, to an anonymous investment company that was formed in Abu Dhabi called Chicago Parking Meters LLC, for $1billion. It got approved by pretty much all the alderman and alderwomen, even though they didn’t do any research on it. This is after they sold one of the tollways for a few hundred million to fill another budget hole earlier.

The sale went through, the city budget got balanced for the rest of the mayors term, and the LLC immediately tripled the price of street parking from $2 to $6, made all their money back in 5 years, and the mayor that made the deal went to go work for the firm that put it together.

And the Llc still has like another 85 years left of getting all the parking revenue. People got together with law firms in the City and tried to sue to get out of it but all the judges basically said “The deal isn’t illegal, your officials just made a really dumb deal that screwed the citizens over. Deal with it.“ :yeshrug:

It’s one of the worst governmental business transactions in history.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
1,302
Reputation
250
Daps
3,507
Reppin
prosper any where on earth
In Chicago, if they have an event where the parking meters on the street are blocked off or inaccessible and cars can’t park there, the City has to pay the private company that owns all of the cities parking meters the lost revenue from cars not being able to park there. The City charges a fee to whatever organization is responsible for shutting down the parking spots if it’s for an event, so it just like the MTA is doing the same thing that’s been happening here for over a decade.

:yeshrug:
Damn, I was just thinking to myself. This move from NY smells like some Chicago level of fukkery.
Y'all got the most out landish corruption in the US next to LA and here in NY
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,238
Reputation
8,032
Daps
151,823
Back in 2008 when the recession hit, the mayor didn’t want to raise property taxes or fire teachers to plug the budget hole. So he worked with JP Morgan bank and Katten firm to sell all the parking meters on a 100 Year long lease, to an anonymous investment company that was formed in Abu Dhabi called Chicago Parking Meters LLC, for $1billion. It got approved by pretty much all the alderman and alderwomen, even though they didn’t do any research on it. This is after they sold one of the tollways for a few hundred million to fill another budget hole earlier.

The sale went through, the city budget got balanced for the rest of the mayors term, and the LLC immediately tripled the price of street parking from $2 to $6, made all their money back in 5 years, and the mayor that made the deal went to go work for the firm that put it together.

And the Llc still has like another 85 years left of getting all the parking revenue. People got together with law firms in the City and tried to sue to get out of it but all the judges basically said “The deal isn’t illegal, your officials just made a really dumb deal that screwed the citizens over. Deal with it.“ :yeshrug:

It’s one of the worst governmental business transactions in history.

chicago could heavily reduce the value of those parking spots by massively improving public transportation.
 
Top