After Harlemsown latest banning,is it time?

[Illeye buckmatic]

Harlemsown is just the latest nikka to get banned multiple times It seems as if the same nikkas is getting banned over and over Do yall ever feel enough is enough Should they keep getting chance after chance or is it time to let these repeat offenders know that they Should there be a three strike and you're out policy? 5 strikes? Or should they be allowed to serve their time and keep coming back?

 

[Swiggy]

3 Strikes seems fair enough

 

[yo moms]

You should get 25 strikes before you are permabanned.

 

[Swiggy]

You should get 25 strikes before you are permabanned.

Gotham City laws

 

[Illeye buckmatic]

3 Strikes seems fair enough

Seems as if these nikkas never learn Harlemsown,mikebrownsjob,youloveme,Tom and his aliases,all seem to think they bigger than the board. And right after they do their e-bids,they go right back to doing the same shyt. Harlemsown is always bragging about how big he is on the board like he's an e-celebrity

 

[↓R↑LYB]

You should get 25 strikes before you are permabanned.

I think we should play it safe and make it 100. Just to be sure

 

[Silkk]

Get em out for good

 

[Illeye buckmatic]

You should get 25 strikes before you are permabanned.

You sure that ain't to harsh

 

[JP_614]

Depending on the offense there should be a stronger ban punishment something crazy should be a longer ban something not so bad a shorter one then you implement the 3 strikes your out rule IMO

 

[MAKAVELI25]

The perma-ban should be RARELY used. This forum is meant for grown ass men, short of someone revealing some personal/financially compromising information about another poster, there should be nobody getting banned at all. Unless someone is revealing stuff like your address/social security number then just charge it to the game

 

[NoMoreWhiteWoman2020]

take it a step further and count one offense of unwarranted harassing and lame bullshyt exposals that dont expose shyt as two strikes. what grown ass man cares what another random female looks like? unless its a mikebrownsjob/ sierra mist level thing, it doesnt need to be done. talking shyt is one thing, but putting someones pics out there who dont want em out is 7th grade bullshyt. we can have fukkery without embarassing the innocents

 

[MikelArteta]

 

[BuyandSave]

What did he get banned for this time? Let me guess, something to do with pics of a female poster again?

 

[Illeye buckmatic]

What did he get banned for this time? Let me guess, something to do with pics of a female poster again?

Pretty much. I didn't see the pic but apparently @Keith Harrow warned him not to post some pic and he did it anyway

 

[Rarely-Wrong Liggins]

Pretty much. I didn't see the pic but apparently @Keith Harrow warned him not to post some pic and he did it anyway

Brook warned him but he posted the picture again anyway. I just removed it and let him live but he went back re-edited the post and put it back in. I think he did the same to a few posts Brooklyn modified too. Next thing I know he's banned.

And to the exposal suggestion; NO! That's some SOHH shyt. The struggle fukkery is weak but to ban people over it is weaker. Those exposals don't have any lasting affect anyway.