Also, here's a Soviet anti-racist propaganda film from 1933:
Last edited by a moderator:
yeah exactly, communism was very attractive to african americans but communist ideology is still garbage
Marxism isn't though.
One is not the other.
Don't really understand zerozero's stance.
He said on the other thread that the US chooses who to side with here and there according to their interests (which is true) but then he seems to be advocating that the USSR did this out of actual sympathy for the African American cause.
You can be hypocritical about who you sympathize with while still genuinely sympathizing with them.
Great point. Sympathizing with certain groups far away can be a great way to convince yourself of your goodness while you continue to be complicit in discrimination at home. White liberals do this all the time, and Conservatives do it as well, though in a bit of a different way.
the neocons have made an art of this. I'm amazed at how they suddenly get concerned about kurds or women in iran or shias in pakistan etc. when they need to make an argument about some place
BBC NEWS | Europe | Africans 'under siege' in MoscowAfricans 'under siege' in Moscow
so you're saying that neocons genuinely sympathize with kurds, women in iran and shias in pakistan?
Don't really understand zerozero's stance.
He said on the other thread that the US chooses who to side with here and there according to their interests (which is true) but then he seems to be advocating that the USSR did this out of actual sympathy for the African American cause.
well it depends. the neocons tend to focus on it when they're trying to get something done or make an argument and then drop it. but if someone's been focused on it for a while in a detailed way then yes I'd say that person is probably genuinely concerned in addition to whatever made them focus on the issue