#ADOS Feature Article in the NYTimes

8WON6

The Great Negro
Supporter
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
63,779
Reputation
13,577
Daps
261,266
Reppin
Kansas City, MO.
That article is such a passive jab, it tries to seem objective. But it shows itself that it's not.

Especially by calling us "agitators"

Man who wrote this and what is their ethnicity?
using words like "insurgents". technically it's correct by definition. But when you google insurgents you get this:
iraq.jpg
 

The Fade

I don’t argue with niqqas on the Internet anymore
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
23,812
Reputation
7,288
Daps
130,031
i hate how these descriptions of ADOS never go into details on why people feel a certain way about things. they say stuff like "the group has been painted as anti-immigrant"...well talk about how LATINO immigrants come here and compete for jobs. Talk about many "people of color" work to undermine ADOS. Talk about Erivo's anti-African American sentiments don't just yadda yadda yadda past it. Talk about Kamala Harris saying she was do anything just for black people, while halfway dabbling in "blackness" and the pandering when she wants votes.

Noticed how throughout the years before ADOS described who we were, EVERYONE of all races and ethnic groups push us under the rug, pretend we don’t exist, pretend our good points never were said, leave out key points concerning our view points, obtuseness and disingenuity aimed at us, etc. SPECIFICALLY us

It’s as if the whole world is in on one huge gaslight.

Like when people say “no one has enough strength to do these jobs but Hispanics” OUR LOW INCOME CLASS WAS DOING THEM. They were ethnically cleansed out because Mexicans share one paycheck. The same thing is happening in trades. They keep trying to retcon history. I EVEN SEE OTHER BLACK PEOPLE PARROT THIS shyt

“Be real nikkas would never do these jobs” but they did and were paid better for it

This article does what society stays doing: lots of dumb smartism passed off as them knowing the whole picture when they don’t
 

Benefited

Banned
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
10,787
Reputation
91
Daps
30,215
using words like "insurgents". technically it's correct by definition. But when you google insurgents you get this:
iraq.jpg


insurgent is a funny word choice. If you have a big vocabulary it probably isn't. But the average person when they hear insurgent it brings up images of the above. Not sure what the demographic of the NY times reader is.
 

you're NOT "n!ggas"

FKA ciroq drobama
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,640
Reputation
6,361
Daps
63,342
Reppin
Astronomy (8th light)
That article is such a passive jab, it tries to seem objective. But it shows itself that it's not.

Especially by calling us "agitators"

Man who wrote this and what is their ethnicity?
I don't see why that in and of itself would be a bad thing. Political agitation necessary to be heard.
 

GMoney

Nostalgia Junkie
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
1,859
Reputation
1,176
Daps
8,999
Reppin
Abundance
i hate how these descriptions of ADOS never go into details on why people feel a certain way about things. they say stuff like "the group has been painted as anti-immigrant"...well talk about how LATINO immigrants come here and compete for jobs. Talk about many "people of color" work to undermine ADOS. Talk about Erivo's anti-African American sentiments don't just yadda yadda yadda past it. Talk about Kamala Harris saying she was do anything just for black people, while halfway dabbling in "blackness" and the pandering when she wants votes.

The existence of ados is an indictment on the existing black politicial class.

This is why it has to be discussed in isolation, or framed in the left/paradigm. Notice how Cornel West is diminished in the article in a way that his conference attendance has as much weight as an uninformed random tweet by Ann Coulter.
 
Top