Active shooter in Pittsburgh (bussing in synagogue/atleast 8 people dead) edit shooter in custody

Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-145
Daps
65,108
Reppin
NULL
well there's confidentiality and it's an active investigation, certain things are only gonna be known by the people who were there. and they had to involve a pretty massive amount of people to 'get the story straight' on a relatively small shooting

i find it more plausible that some racist a$$hole shot up a church than...whatever it is you're proposing, which is vague

1. An ongoing confidentiality investigation shouldnt be leaking every bit of information to the media. I got examples of the media tampering with evidence in a ongoing investigation and crime scene in 2 other shootings. San Bernardino shooting for example.

2. Story needs to be consistent not all over the place.

3. All medical trained staff during mass casualty training consist of triage and mandatory evacuation stations to treat minor, severe and dead.

Research it yourself.
 

Kenny West

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
24,982
Reputation
5,982
Daps
91,837
Reppin
NULL
No one is denying the premise..it can happen anywhere, it has happen before....I'm asking you for details that lack in the story and you go with the flow.
Its crazy how lack of details is what makes you automatically reject real life events with obviously true premises yet lack of details never stop you from believing your own crackpot theories.

*Guy shoots somebody*

Kingsman: b b but where are the shells and gunpowder residue

*Lizardpeople*

Kingsman: Here is a painting of a lizard breh :wow: its real
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-145
Daps
65,108
Reppin
NULL
Its crazy how lack of details is what makes you automatically reject real life events with obviously true premises yet lack of details never stop you from believing your own crackpot theories.

*Guy shoots somebody*

Kingsman: b b but where are the shells and gunpowder residue

*Lizardpeople*

Kingsman: Here is a painting of a lizard breh :wow: its real

Wow....

Here is real life for you in detail..

Do you accept a job without detail of the work?

Do you buy a house or car without detail of price, rates, etc?

Do you take a test in school without detail of what's on the exam?

:sas2:
 

Kenny West

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
24,982
Reputation
5,982
Daps
91,837
Reppin
NULL
Wow....

Here is real life for you in detail..

Do you accept a job without detail of the work?

Do you buy a house or car without detail of price, rates, etc?

Do you take a test in school without detail of what's on the exam?

:sas2:
You dont truly look into these details, you just sparesly mention them to people who obviously wouldnt have them either and use that to deduce something as fake.

The problem with that is yelling fake contrary to journalism standards and witness accounts is a hypothesis in itself and requires its own proof by YOU.

If you're calling all these people liars (pretty much any tragedy in the past 5 years) where is your proof? Where is your details?

You cite lack of details as a reason to believe an event was staged by crisis actors but have no proof or details on how crisis actors could even go about staging things. Nor why or how so many people would lie.

Do you really believe the shyt you post on here?
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-145
Daps
65,108
Reppin
NULL
You dont truly look into these details, you just sparesly mention them to people who obviously wouldnt have them either and use that to deduce something as fake.

The problem with that is yelling fake contrary to journalism standards and witness accounts is a hypothesis in itself and requires its own proof by YOU.

If you're calling all these people liars (pretty much any tragedy in the past 5 years) where is your proof? Where is your details?

You cite lack of details as a reason to believe an event was staged by crisis actors but have no proof or details on how crisis actors could even go about staging things. Nor why or how so many people would lie.

Do you really believe the shyt you post on here?

1. Point out examples

2. Where are the eye witnesses here?

3. I've covered that i many threads before..maybe if you were paying attention you would see them.

4. I give many reasons and cite them all the time but again you arent paying attention. I dont expect you to either.

5. Generations have come and go living off fairy tale lies that were told to them. The political system has molded minds to think in "talking points" and no facts.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-145
Daps
65,108
Reppin
NULL
@Kenny West

Shooting at Country Music Festival in Las Vegas. UPDATE: 61 dead, up to 515+ injured

How to spot a Hoax

Days Before Shooting, Capital Gazette Reported Police Would Be Conducting Mass Shooting Drills






The NDAA Legalizes The Use Of Propaganda On The US Public



The amendment — proposed by Mac Thornberry (R-Texas) and Adam Smith (D-Wash.) and passed in the House last Friday afternoon — would effectively nullify the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948, which explicitly forbids information and psychological operations aimed at influencing U.S. public opinion.


Davis defines IO as "the integrated employment of electronic warfare (EW), computer network operations (CNO), psychological operations (PSYOP), military deception (MILDEC), and operations security (OPSEC), in concert with specified supporting and related capabilities, to influence, disrupt, corrupt or usurp adversarial human and automated decision making while protecting our own."

IO are primarily used to target foreign audiences, but Davis cites numerous senior leaders who want to (in the words of Colonel Richard B. Leap) "protect a key friendly center of gravity, to wit US national will" by repealing the Smith-Mundt Act to allow the direct deployment of these tactics on the American public.

For years, commercial advertisers have based their advertisement strategies on the premise that there is a positive correlation between the number of times a consumer is exposed to product advertisement and that consumer's inclination to sample the new product. The very same principle applies to how we influence our target audiences when we conduct COIN.


https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/mhastings/congressmen-seek-to-lift-propaganda-ban

The new law would give sweeping powers to the government to push television, radio, newspaper, and social media onto the U.S. public. “It removes the protection for Americans,” says a Pentagon official who is concerned about the law. “It removes oversight from the people who want to put out this information. There are no checks and balances. No one knows if the information is accurate, partially accurate, or entirely false.”
 

Kenny West

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
24,982
Reputation
5,982
Daps
91,837
Reppin
NULL
1. Point out examples

2. Where are the eye witnesses here?

3. I've covered that i many threads before..maybe if you were paying attention you would see them.

4. I give many reasons and cite them all the time but again you arent paying attention. I dont expect you to either.

5. Generations have come and go living off fairy tale lies that were told to them. The political system has molded minds to think in "talking points" and no facts.
1. You did it in this thread
2. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...-witness-describes-horror-synagogue-massacre/

Keep in mind you've yet to prove it fake
3. I've seen what you consider "covering stuff" and its a million times more vague and less informative than the things you've called fake. "Look it up yourself"
4. your reasoning is sparse and severly lacking in detail which is ironic considering you dispute information from more reputable outlets.
5. Your "look beyond everything is a lie" crap is akin to a talking point it



As for the 2nd post, the links you posted not only dont apply to this conversation, but are all examples of your severe lack of details.
 

SleezyBigSlim

Banned
Joined
Sep 23, 2014
Messages
19,886
Reputation
-1,515
Daps
52,890
I watch the news last night and now they want to make serious laws against hate crimes. It only took a Jewish church getting shot up for this to happen smdh:smh:. All the mass shootings we've had in the past two years alone. But but when Jews get hit something gets done. Even regular cacs are 2nd class citizens to the Jews that's why non Jewish cacs stay on they head.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-145
Daps
65,108
Reppin
NULL
1. You did it in this thread
2. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...-witness-describes-horror-synagogue-massacre/

Keep in mind you've yet to prove it fake
3. I've seen what you consider "covering stuff" and its a million times more vague and less informative than the things you've called fake. "Look it up yourself"
4. your reasoning is sparse and severly lacking in detail which is ironic considering you dispute information from more reputable outlets.
5. Your "look beyond everything is a lie" crap is akin to a talking point it



As for the 2nd post, the links you posted not only dont apply to this conversation, but are all examples of your severe lack of details.


I cant make you believe stuff that your mind is already made up.

1. Reputation outlets....anything that you perfer is repping the WMDs story? Maybe the Gaddafi did it outlets that lied as well.

2. Where is your evidence on "everything is a lie" crap. I love to see it. Oh wait it's not there.

3. 2nd post doesnt apply and i know you won't look at anything adressed cause it points out your bullshyt excuse of looking it up.

I will dismantle that article as well.
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
49,981
Reputation
4,789
Daps
112,564
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
:scust:newworldafro was crying over these nazis getting de-platformed



I Keep the Same Energy on Speech, Censorship, 1st Amendment, because the principle of free speech outweighs any opposing rebuttals by miles

I'm going to repeat my stance on speech for the 50-11th time, which has not wavered.

Censorship of people you don't like leads to censorship of people you do like or are ok with.

What part of this don't you comprehend?

The other day Facebook/Twitter simultaneously removed 800 pages/accounts, they weren't just conservative pages they included liberal pages too like anti-police brutality pages/accounts.

There are a lot of Black Israelite and Louis Farrakhan supporters or at the minimum listeners on the coli. Going down this continued road of censorship of "harsh speech"....these specific Black/African American voices will be eliminated from Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, etc. After this Pittsburgh situation, it's obvious any critical speech of Khazreal or any related history lessons or perspectives are being considered for censorship on platforms. Gab, which is just a social media site, not an alt-right site is just on the Summer Jam Screen now, and being used as an example. Listening to "aggressive speech" does not equate to violence, unless you are literally threatening someone. Explaining truths that aren't in the mainstream media does not equate to someone committing violence. Yet, this is the justification being thrown around to continue to censor more voices, left, right, and independent. They are going to get to the point, where they are going to whip up Congress to "act".........and that means literally filtering the web. If yall can't see these chess moves, it's because you want to be dense.

Senator Mark Warner already has a bill ready to go where he wants internet ID...that's right ..ID verification required to access the Internet.

Is that what you want?

In another thread, they were talking about Bolsanaro's win in Brazil as bad for the Amazon rainforest, because he apparently has a Trump mindset, where it's moneymaking and deregulation over science, environment, and sustainable development. It sounds like he would support cutting down every tree in the Amazon like a maniac. Well guess what? This year, the Brazilian government approved an internet censorship law. Which means Bolsanoro has a new tool to control the flow of information, especially, for instance silencing voices that want to protect the Anazon rainforest and it's importance to indigenous people, plant/animal species, and the entire globe. So now Bolsanoro can censor voices he doesn't like, and the same type of stuff is happening in Europe, the U.S., China, and around the world.

This is bigger than the U.S., censorship of speech, content or substance be damned unless it's literal threats of violence, is harmful to all of us.

I can't explain my position on speech better than that
 
Last edited:
Top