Abortion after six weeks effectively banned in Texas; SCOTUS by 5-4 vote doesn't overturn law

[videogamestashbox.com]

I'm just gonna say this.

If you're (pro-choice) and don't support this law BUT you're (anti-choice) on taking the vaccine, then you're a hypocrite.

If you're (pro-choice) on taking the vaccine BUT you support this (anti-choice) law, then you're a hypocrite.

Either you are pro-choice across the board or you're not pro-choice at all. Either you believe the government should regulate your body or you don't. I notice people from both issues are in this thread now making the opposite argument. Pick a position and stick to it.

Lemme try and clean this up for ya ........cause that shyt you wrote was making my head hurt






Now on the topic of pro/anti-choice two things come to mind.....


1.

2.

“Like a system of politics, science has sought foremost its own preservation,”

"Theory does not advance ideas (as the positivists asserted in the early part of this
century), theory justifies ideas. Empirical methodology is not a tool of revelation and
verification, but rather a tool of refutation and a shield of obstruction behind which the
ideas a theory justifies are operationalized as programs immune to self-interested
criticism. Therefore, the most crucial considerations in the development of theory are (1)
the ideological programs that theory is capable of justifying; and (2) the methodological
framework its protection and preservation demand."

The Theoretical and Methodological Crisis of the Africentric Conception
W. Curtis Banks
The Journal of Negro Education
Vol. 61, No. 3, Africentrism and Multiculturalism: Conflict or Consonance (Summer, 1992), pp. 262-272

They are simply attempting to use the objective verifiable binary notion of someone being either pro-choice or anti-choice as a rallying/talking point for like minded individuals and a shield to justify and guard whatever political views they have from criticism. More Specifically it acts as a rationalization to build that specific shield to protect that specific political position.



I.E. the pro-choice or anti-choice binary was rationalized as a rallying/talking point for like minded individuals and a "logical slogan" to shield a political position related to women's bodies; not as a neutral, universal, apolitical theory(no such thing by the way).

 

[Contrefaire]

That’s not biology..... No species self terminates a pregnancy really.....

What the fukk? Do you know what a miscarriage (aka spontaneous abortion) is??

 

[Contrefaire]

True enough. However, I believe this reasoning is becoming a copout. While I do believe in sex-ed, there does come a time when parents have to teach their children about sex

You're still not getting it. The parents who want sex-ed out of schools are NOT the type to sit their kids down and have frank, open discussions about sex at some point. They spend half the kid's childhood not even wanting to imagine them growing up and being sexually active one day and the other half trying to fill their heads with lies while using scare tactics and shaming language to keep them ignorant and 'chaste'.

That birds and the bees talk becomes "When a mommy and daddy love each other very much sometimes at night they give each other special hugs and then a 9 months later a baby comes!" real quick.

 

[Contrefaire]

I'm pro choice, but I don't care if they dial this back there needs to be some accountability here. There are way to many methods and resources out here to prevent pregnancies now that IMO unless you can show you literally tried to not get pregnant(aka she was on birth control) you shouldn't be able to just abort babies like that I'm sorry, notable exceptions of rape and incest that's fukked up they forcing them to have those babies.

What does "accountability" even mean in this context? What does that look like, exactly? Because forced BITRH is not forced accountability by any stretch of the imagination. This is more GOP/Evangelical bullshyt couched in personal responsibility nonsense language. If you force a woman to carry a pregnancy to term you aren't doing anything but trying to punish her for fukking, simple as that. But wait, was THAT the accountability you were talking about?

Because giving birth =/= motherhood and certainly has no bearing on 'accountability'.

 

[bnew]

 

[bnew]

 

[Contrefaire]

You can get a morning after pill from a vending machine on most college campuses or 24 hour CVS drive thru for $40. If you don't have $40 you shouldn't be fukking lol

Meanwhile condoms are FREE at various city clinics and student health centers on college campuses and frankly don't cost that much out of pocket. Yet nikkas still try to slip them off, beg chicks to go raw or simply don't mention them if the woman doesn't insist.

By your logic no nikka alive should be fukking unless he has (at minimum) roughly $115K (half the average cost of raising ONE child in America btw) at his disposal. Because you shouldn't fukk unless you can afford the consequences, right?

 

[El Bombi]

Stop deflecting.

DO you defending the decision of government stopping abortions or not??

Damn you're really slow.

 

[Wild self]

Damn you're really slow.

No, you the fukking slow one for not answering the question. Type of shyt that gets you locked up.

 

[mson]

Elections have consequences

 

[El Bombi]

No, you the fukking slow one for not answering the question. Type of shyt that gets you locked up.

No wonder you're a goofy ImmiC00N Shill that believes anything your White Supremacist Daddy political parties tell you.

 

[hatealot]

What the fukk is wrong with Texas, is this some form of brain washing or some shyt?

 

[Starski]

Well why wasn’t he sleeping around with women who do want children, where is the accountability!

Did I do this right

 

[Wild self]

No wonder you're a goofy ImmiC00N Shill that believes anything your White Supremacist Daddy political parties tell you.

So you defend this. Just join the Taliban like the immigrant that you hate. At least they skip showers, like your musty ass does.

 

[skylove4]