Aaron Hernandez questioned by police in homicide probe (Update: Found guilty of first degree murder)

[Marciano]

the only way he really gets out of it is if he starts talking but he might of been the one to pull the trigger

the police are gonna start to round up his associates and squeeze them real tight to see which one makes the deal


i really hope he wasn't involved but when your doing all this stuff to hide your involvement your really in knee deep shyt

Yeah....now they're bringing up some pass incidents regarding Hernandez & shootings. Looks like he be busting his gun, or at least his folks sure do.

 

[Bboystyle]

has anybody mentioned what Murdernandez was smoking the night this went down...

cause anything that makes you think you can

rent a car

kill a dude around the car you rented in your name

leave body in woods close to your house

destroy you camera

destroy your video surveillance

have you house professionally cleaned

all the while having multiple stories of other people get shot that you just happened to know, associate with, be around, multiple times

and get away with it

is much stronger than this wack ass yard grass i am smoking

anyone who smokes is wack

 

[aqualung]

we also have to remember the 2 other guys that were supposedly in the car. there gonna put pressure on them as well and whoever snitches first gets the best deal...

Cops can't even find the other rental car.
be on the lookout, erbody

AH isn't naming names of the other two guys. They may be back in the old country by now (or on another cartel run).

 

[Ayo]

What I don't understand is...

The Globe reported today that video images taken early Monday morning appear to show Hernandez with Lloyd on Fayston Street in Boston just hours before Lloyd’s bullet-riddled body was found.
No arrests yet in slaying of man acquainted with New England Patriots player Aaron Hernandez - Boston.com

This nikka was right in the middle of the hood in the dead of night.

I've seen Hernandez out a bunch of times at this lounge/club in Boston called Cure. He's usually in a hoodie and sweatpants with no jewelry on him....

BUT STILL. If I'm worth 40 million you're not catching me in the hood at 3:50 am

 

[Ayo]

He tried to destroy evidence to show that Lloyd was with him that night but now he's fukked because there was other sightings of them together!

Apparently police said Lloyd was shot where he was left, so some more shyt needs to be explained. Why was he even at a industrial site?

99.9% sure they were at Cure Boston on Sunday night. Place has about a million cameras inside due to a previous shooting when it used to be called Aria.

No way Hernandez was getting in and out of there without being seen with this dude.

 

[Ayo]

Your "163 on the LSATs" contradicts what I've heard from real lawyers

In Hollywood movies?

So explain how attorney-client privilege fits into all this? How would one ever prove if an attorney knew for sure his client was guilty if that confession (and the details around it) are protected?


You really think they holding themselves to an honor code

Like you said, they're focused on feeding their families, unwanted surprises don't aid in that, it hinders it.

Again, you're thinking of the Lionel Hutz stereotypical TV/Movie lawyer.

A competent lawyer would never ask their client if they are guilty and would avoid the conversation at all costs. Because AGAIN, once a lawyer KNOWS you're guilty s/he can not put any testimony that contradicts that knowledge. It's called subornation of perjury.

If you have a scumbag of a client who confessed that he killed someone to you. Are you really going to risk your license to practice law over a scumbag liar? I doubt it. Imagine having that hanging over your head while this guy stews in jail. He'd file for appeal, expose your ass, and get you disbarred.

So to go back to the initial point....Hernandez giving all of the true facts to his lawyer is the WORST thing he can do and his lawyers won't let him do that. I bet one of the first things they said to him was to shut up and not say anything to anyone, not even them, until the case/charges/evidence comes in.

1) Hernandez most likely met with, and retained his lawyers

2) They told him of his rights, what he should and shouldn't do, PR wise. They certainly did not ask him what he did that night or whether he was guilty or not.

3) They will wait til the state presses charges and turns over the evidence before they question him about the state's evidence AND ONLY the states evidence. They are fighting the evidence. They have no interest in whether he did it or not.

4) By waiting for the evidence and not getting a confession from Hernandez they now have the freedom to present whatever type of case they want. The more of the truth Hernandez tells them (if he was involved) the less of a good job they can do because they won't be able to contradict any of what he says in a court of law. It would be perjury.

One of the most powerful law firms in Boston's not going to put their practice on the line for a scumbag like Hernandez.

 

[Black White Sox Hat]

.

Keep us updated resident Coli news reporter.You on top of thangs.

 

[Dwight Howard]

anyone who smokes is wack

where's alcohol?

 

[R.E.N. Spells Ren]

In Hollywood movies?



Again, you're thinking of the Lionel Hutz stereotypical TV/Movie lawyer.

A competent lawyer would never ask their client if they are guilty and would avoid the conversation at all costs. Because AGAIN, once a lawyer KNOWS you're guilty s/he can not put any testimony that contradicts that knowledge. It's called subornation of perjury.

If you have a scumbag of a client who confessed that he killed someone to you. Are you really going to risk your license to practice law over a scumbag liar? I doubt it. Imagine having that hanging over your head while this guy stews in jail. He'd file for appeal, expose your ass, and get you disbarred.

So to go back to the initial point....Hernandez giving all of the true facts to his lawyer is the WORST thing he can do and his lawyers won't let him do that. I bet one of the first things they said to him was to shut up and not say anything to anyone, not even them, until the case/charges/evidence comes in.

1) Hernandez most likely met with, and retained his lawyers

2) They told him of his rights, what he should and shouldn't do, PR wise. They certainly did not ask him what he did that night or whether he was guilty or not.

3) They will wait til the state presses charges and turns over the evidence before they question him about the state's evidence AND ONLY the states evidence. They are fighting the evidence. They have no interest in whether he did it or not.

4) By waiting for the evidence and not getting a confession from Hernandez they now have the freedom to present whatever type of case they want. The more of the truth Hernandez tells them (if he was involved) the less of a good job they can do because they won't be able to contradict any of what he says in a court of law. It would be perjury.

One of the most powerful law firms in Boston's not going to put their practice on the line for a scumbag like Hernandez.

You didn't answer the question?

If a scumbag client confesses to you, how could you ever be convicted of suborning perjury?

Where is the risk?

(and please, miss me with the TV shyt, I assure you that's not where I'm coming from).

 

[CanesMiamiLakers]

Nobody talk everybody walk

 

[the artist known az]

In Hollywood movies?



Again, you're thinking of the Lionel Hutz stereotypical TV/Movie lawyer.

A competent lawyer would never ask their client if they are guilty and would avoid the conversation at all costs. Because AGAIN, once a lawyer KNOWS you're guilty s/he can not put any testimony that contradicts that knowledge. It's called subornation of perjury.

If you have a scumbag of a client who confessed that he killed someone to you. Are you really going to risk your license to practice law over a scumbag liar? I doubt it. Imagine having that hanging over your head while this guy stews in jail. He'd file for appeal, expose your ass, and get you disbarred.

So to go back to the initial point....Hernandez giving all of the true facts to his lawyer is the WORST thing he can do and his lawyers won't let him do that. I bet one of the first things they said to him was to shut up and not say anything to anyone, not even them, until the case/charges/evidence comes in.

1) Hernandez most likely met with, and retained his lawyers

2) They told him of his rights, what he should and shouldn't do, PR wise. They certainly did not ask him what he did that night or whether he was guilty or not.

3) They will wait til the state presses charges and turns over the evidence before they question him about the state's evidence AND ONLY the states evidence. They are fighting the evidence. They have no interest in whether he did it or not.

4) By waiting for the evidence and not getting a confession from Hernandez they now have the freedom to present whatever type of case they want. The more of the truth Hernandez tells them (if he was involved) the less of a good job they can do because they won't be able to contradict any of what he says in a court of law. It would be perjury.

One of the most powerful law firms in Boston's not going to put their practice on the line for a scumbag like Hernandez.

The same way your questioning me about what I've been told by an actual Lawyer, I'm questioning your 163 on the LSAT but didn't want to go to law school.

 

[PTBG]

This nikka Hernandez still wearing the same shyt he wore yesterday?

 

[muzikfrk75]

Court clerk: No arrest warrant issued for Aaron Hernandez

 

[GoldenGlove]

This nikka going to prison and the FML HOF

 

[Brady-Carter]

WTF is going on, now they're saying there has been no warrant issued.