NobodyReally
Superstar
It's really telling how no one is addressing the RAPE part of the allegations in here. So quick to jump on the willing "wenches" and ignore the countless women he forced.
You're doing the same thing right now in trying to shift the focus on the women he "forced" (putting that in quotes because we don't even know the details about that whole situation) and not the ones who willingly slept with him, who are far more numerous. His facebook pages is full of pictures of him groping black women of all ages but you want us to ignore that because it lowkey hurt you that we may not care as much about the fate of these women due to their own bad decisions.It's really telling how no one is addressing the RAPE part of the allegations in here. So quick to jump on the willing "wenches" and ignore the countless women he forced.
Florence is a small ass country town. I'd have to transfer at the Greyhound station there and ain't a damn thing to see there.
You're doing the same thing right now in trying to shift the focus on the women he "forced" (putting that in quotes because we don't even know the details about that whole situation) and not the ones who willingly slept with him, who are far more numerous. His facebook pages is full of pictures of him groping black women of all ages but you want us to ignore that because it lowkey hurt you that we may not care as much about the fate of these women due to their own bad decisions.
Crazy thing is, people have adressed the raping and sleeping with minors part but the fact that this man still slep with so many adult women who were consenting, despite the fact that he looks like a sleazebag is concerning.
Now I'm not teliing this man should be free but let's not cover our eyes to the truth because it displeases you.
I see what you're saying but some posters here are implying all of these women were raped in the sense of they were forced to have sex, even though this isn't the case for the most part (that we know of). Of course I know that withholding information about STDs is condemnable but it's not rape in the sense of what the poster I was responding to was trying to push, and bashing us for not acknowledging.Truth is sex without informed consent is rape. Material facts were omitted. Giving someone a false sense of safety to have sex with them is rape; exposing them to STIs, stealthing, lying about contraceptives such as birth control or vasectomy, anal sex when they agreed to vaginal sex - all rape, because the nature of the act(s) itself should be known to both parties for consent to be valid.
You can’t go after people who freely choose to date whoever they want. If you do that you most likely to end up in prison, because that swirler will be against you. Hell no will I go to jail for a bedwench.Not only that but there’s a handful of dudes on here who are SCARED TO go after white males when they date bw but so quick to slam a black man when they do the same thing. shyts so assbackwards.
But at the same token these same dudes likke that fakkit @Texasvescence want to police black men in their dating choices but dont say shyt about white men dating black women. Its cowardly because these dikkless fakkits choose an easy target in black males but dont say shyt about the crackers infecting and sexually assaulting their queens. So why would an alleged "black" (still up for debate) black male only goes after other blackk males for their dating choices but not crackers when they come after bw? Not even on this forum the p*ssy polices white male lust for black women. Only bm. Thats some bytch shyt if ever seen any.You can’t go after people who freely choose to date whoever they want. If you do that you most likely to end up in prison, because that swirler will be against you. Hell no will I go to jail for a bedwench.
But at the same token these same dudes likke that fakkit @Texasvescence want to police black men in their dating choices but dont say shyt about white men dating black women. Its cowardly because these dikkless fakkits choose an easy target in black males but dont say shyt about the crackers infecting and sexually assaulting their queens. So why would an alleged "black" (still up for debate) black male only goes after other blackk males for their dating choices but not crackers when they come after bw? Not even on this forum the p*ssy polices white male lust for black women. Only bm. Thats some bytch shyt if ever seen any.
I feel you on the motives of that post and I agree as far as the form of manipulation not being brute force.it's not rape in the sense of what the poster I was responding to was trying to push, and bashing us for not acknowledging.
It's not just condemnable, it's actually rape. In the same vein that stealthing is - both give the victim a false sense of safety the perpetrator takes advantage of.I know that withholding information about STDs is condemnable
We know this man has AIDS. If he had sex without telling them, it was rape - it's not that murkyshift the focus on the women he "forced" (putting that in quotes because we don't even know the details about that whole situation)
"willingly slept with him" they lacked awareness;the ones who willingly slept with him, who are far more numerous.
"it shouldn't have been so easy for him to trap them" is how I read thatwomen who were consenting, despite the fact that he looks like a sleazebag is concerning
I think we should care just as much as we do the kids he took advantage of.we may not care as much about the fate of these women due to their own bad decisions
This is only scraping the surface, it goes deeper.
And this is what some of these young girls follow, that is the danger. This weird cult like influence and defying "other races". Yet when things go wrong these swirling Youtubers start to blame Black men, by shifting the narrative.
What most people don't know is how the Trans Atlantic slave trade started.
History explains us that the war at Timbuktu was fought over Black women's freedom, which the Moroccan sultan was in disagreement with and a war was started. This war weakened the army of Timbuktu and the West Sudanese empire as a whole. The second war was with Portugal, against an already weakened army. And swirlers freely had biracial children with these foreign men. It was these biracial children who started the Trans Atlantic slave trade. The book here Daughters of the Trade describes this some of this history:
Here is the lecture by the author.
So when some say Africans sold Africans, we now understand who these "Africans" were.
And this post should not be scrutinized or misinterpreted, because as Black men we do have to take accountability in this day and age, as do other "races" of men.