A war with China wouldn't be as simple/easy as folks think

Grand Conde

Superstar
Joined
Feb 11, 2013
Messages
17,351
Reputation
3,282
Daps
27,510
Reppin
NULL
China would destroy every major city in a blink of an eye with a million death drones emerging from one shipping container in the northeast :mjlol:



AND they got free healthcare, net zero poverty, and everyone over the age of 18 can afford their own place :heh:

Y'all really think some musty CACS in fatigues to get their student loans paid off will be able run the fade with a 6th gen fighter?



My man what. :deadrose:
 

IIVI

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
13,022
Reputation
3,329
Daps
46,063
Reppin
Los Angeles
Im skeptical of this. Nuclear India and nuclearchina hate each other's guts and have already had fights post nuclear armament.

India and Pakistan despise each other even more than China/America or China/India. And and they had an official war in 1999 right after Pakistan got nukes. Yet, restraint was shown despite the death of thousands of soldiers on both sides. And both countries got nukes specifically for genocide against the other country.

I'd imagine what we'd have instead of mutually assured destruction in a modern war against nuclear powers, is a gentleman's agreement similar to world war II where the countries involved agreed amongst themselves not to use copious amounts of chemical weapons like they used in world war I, because the great Powers at the time agreed to the horrors of the previous war. None of these countries ever destroyed those chemical weapons, but they kept them in the background just in case. We have a very similar gentleman's agreement in countries with biological weapons programs, of which there are dozens of such countries that could end life on earth with a virus .


In the most extreme case, I would postulate that the nuclear weapons would be used to prevent total warfare, and give a bare minimum standard of living after the war ends. And obviously as a countermeasure in case the other side starts with nukes immediately.

I think the case with China/America is just different. It’s two monsters who would go at it with everything to lose.

America has shown to have already set the precedent that they’d use it. So I don’t think any nuclear-capable Super Power would take the chance America doesn’t strike them with a nuke off the bat imo. The tensions are too high.

Especially with the threat of hypersonics from China both countries know the other side won’t play or would be much closer to using one than any previous other conflict. Then there’s the threat of the enemy disabling your nuclear capabilities and your reputation in the world is over. I think both economies have too much to lose in the world to not go nuclear and knock the other Super Power off.

Last edit: I think it depends on the type of war as well. If a battle should emerge out the blue I think you may see a skirmish out in the Pacific and the two sides talk it out and cool things down. However, it reaching a point where both sides are looking to take the sole spot in the world or going for all the marbles or they’re looking to enforce and restrict a major military position, they’d light each other up.
 
Last edited:

3rdWorld

Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
45,696
Reputation
4,136
Daps
134,040
China is too tech reliant now in everything, that's not a credit its a dangerous gamble with their lives..
Shut down their systems they're sitting ducks..
 

GreenGhxst

Veteran
Joined
Sep 6, 2016
Messages
26,654
Reputation
4,651
Daps
91,723
Reppin
Tangibles
Why are we entertaining this dumbass idea of going to war with China when we know it's a real possibility
 

MegaManX

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
3,324
Reputation
6,415
Daps
16,944
hell, a war with canada would be a nightmare.

America is divided as hell. Sending 100k troops to Iraq is one thing.

Fighting a border war vs a united country when literally half of america hates the other half with a passion that we can EASILY break out into a civil war or entire states just breaking off.

Imagine if idiot trump declared war on Canada. Do you really think the New England stats are gonna ride with "america" over their best neighbor ever? People in Massachusetts will 100% ride with Ontario over Alabama.
 

TDUBB

All Star
Joined
Nov 1, 2013
Messages
2,619
Reputation
-50
Daps
6,090
China? is this a fukking joke? :laff:

500 million chinese are impoverished peasants in grass huts :mindblown:

"afford their own place"? :laff:they work an 80 hour work week
Cracker, you clearly have never been to China. Your mind is picturing of what China use to be in 1965. Lol grass huts. There lack of homeless people on the streets alone speaks volumes.

America is even worse, they have the largest obesity rate, $1 trillion in credit card debt, homeless and drugs use is rampart, you have people working two jobs still living in Moms house at the age of 35 like you.
 
Last edited:

TDUBB

All Star
Joined
Nov 1, 2013
Messages
2,619
Reputation
-50
Daps
6,090
 

King

The black man is always targeted.
Joined
Apr 8, 2017
Messages
19,188
Reputation
4,249
Daps
81,532
So I guess this report is all lies?



"China once enjoyed an optimistic and confident middle class. It supported the economy’s growth path with sometimes exuberant spending and aggressive investing. Sadly, those millions are now losing ground, with many slipping back toward poverty.


This is no small problem for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). It has long had an implicit contract with the Chinese people under which they will quietly tolerate the party in power and the party will deliver them prosperity. The authorities increasingly seem to be failing on their end of the bargain. So far, the public has taken a passive approach to the situation, cutting back on spending and trying, against the odds, to rebuild wealth. If things go to extremes, however, there is no telling how the Chinese people will react. There was after all considerable violence during the recession of 2009."

Do you have any source that counters what Forbes is saying?
Yeah it most likely is fake propaganda spread by US intelligence.

How about I give you a source you'd appreciate, negroliberal?

 

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
30,783
Reputation
5,398
Daps
48,569
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
Yeah, none of these Super Powers are going to fight each other directly because it’ll be nukes as the first and last option. This ain’t going to be like Top Gun or storming beaches.

... until nanites get invented that can consume / disarm nukes.

:hubie:
 

3rdWorld

Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
45,696
Reputation
4,136
Daps
134,040
As hated as America is, it still has a few friends around the world..
China, has zero friends or allies in the world..North Korea and Russia don't count.

China also has too many people to feed, give water and provide warmth in a war where the water supplies have been shut off or polluted, food supplies cut off with most Chinese living in large cities.
A sustained and prolonged war would result in China surrendering sooner than you think.
 

omnifax

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
3,556
Reputation
1,040
Daps
9,872
Reppin
Kalamazoo, MI #ADOS
Setting nukes aside I'm not so sure China would be as tough to take on. Not that I want any of this to happen but one thing I'll say about the U.S. military is it's constatly involved in battles, not exerecises actual battles. China's military for the most part is not really battle tested and that can be the difference maker if we are talking boots on the ground. There are other factors you have to think about though such as where the fight it is located like say Taiwan then logistics can be a huge advantage.

Edit I think China's biggest advantage is number of troops they could supply. Kind of like the Ukraine/Russia war where Russia just has way more people it can throw in the meat grinder to outlast the much smaller Ukraine.
 

Givethanks

Superstar
Joined
Dec 4, 2015
Messages
9,454
Reputation
1,149
Daps
19,613
The US got schooled in Vietnam Iraq and Afghanistan they didn’t win any of those wars

The only war the US “won” in recent history was world war 2 and they did it by nuking innocent civilians in two different cities
But boss man, invading a country is always tough, especially back in the day when combat was all "boots on the ground" and Idk alot of Nam, but Afghanistan's terrain is challenging as hell. I could be wrong but I don't think they've ever been conquered or colonized.

I think China is the boogeyman, and they know they can't match the US when it comes to brute military power. I know for damn sure the US can't invade China physically and vice versa.

The way you do it in today's world is through a proxy war or cyber warfare, which I think China has the upper hand seeing how Americans move.
 
Top