what part didn't you like?
Was it when I said people knowing taking advantge of something paid for by taxpayers was upsetting?
Was it where I said there should be a limit on the amount of useless/junk food paid for by taxpayers?
Was it were I said i'm in support of the program because it keeps people from starving?
you're trippin. The majority of people on stamps need them and use them appropriately... furthermore, most of the time the amount isn't enough to cover all the food they need... it's supplemental.
I'm not trippin. I know most people use them correctly, hell I grew up on them no shame in that. Let's be real though, the purpose of the program is to feed people who wouldn't be able to do so on their own, I'll also add that it does it with a sense of pride. That being said the actions of the people at this walmart is shady to me. Just because some CAN be taken advantage of doesn't mean you SHOULD take advantage of it...on a side note I think Walmart is just as shady if not moreso because you know damn well they are going to submit that bill back to the fed like
"We can't help that your system fuked up"
1. In summary EBT/SNAP/Foodstamps are a great thing.
2. The actions of the people were shameful
3. The action of Walmart was shameful
4. There should be a limit on the amount of junk food one can purchase with EBT.
If there's an argument against any of those 4 points i'd really like to hear it.