Same. Not sure if we’re talking about the same site. But yet the poster that has been granted the most non-restricted visibility is an UNverified feminist white troll who pretends to “blend in” under the guise of alignment, pushes white and Asian “culture”, has warnings for anti-AA rhetoric, who has NOT been photo, video or identification confirmed from Canada because she (or he) who tf knows, brings chaos = traffic to that site. Who has already sowed a seed of dissension among black members not even a few months in. That’s the site where you have to go through authentication- make it make sense.
Especially when said platform uses that as it’s primary advertisement advantage for black participation. No matter where we go, there they are. Claiming their space over there is “black dominant”, making black people go through various methods of verification, while allowing whites to still have access and permission is such a nonsequitir when not equally enforced. Rather than not letting whites have access to or stay out of certain discussions strictly pertaining to us as black people, it becomes another form of confusion conflict with the “just ignore them” routine on that space.
tl/dr- if whites can buy and sell their way into authentication, then being black verified only solves part of the problem. It’s like using black people to push your product then changing up the rules. Bait and switch as a false front for a safe space. Restricting access and enforcement makes a difference.
nikkas was mystified by them names.
. 
