8 billy in food stamp cuts, they don't really care about us

[88m3]

Ok, now we're getting somewhere. Also, please note we were speaking strictly supply/demand, not food stamps. But let's continue with your train of thought. What is the bread distributor going to do when the retailer buys less bread?

They can up sell, make less bread, and or expand to other markets.

You're the one advocating cutting food stamps.

Are you seeing how cutting food stamps is detrimental to the economy yet or no?

 

[blackzeus]

They can up sell or expand to other markets.

You're the one advocating cutting food stamps.

Breh, you're stating every answer except the obvious one. Peace breh, I'll let you do you.

 

[IGSaint12]

Agreed, but how many average blacks and latinos that live below the poverty line think they have anything in common with Centrist, Corporate Democrats? That's important to consider too. A lot of the problems and issues that affect the poor come from Democratic Politicians.

Democrats can't do shyt because of white voters that keep voting in republicans and far right ones at that. Until whites decide to start voting for centrist or left leaning republicans, democrats will have no reason to go even further to the left. It's because of white people that keep voting in republicans that we have gridlock in congress that doesn't allow shyt to get done. This false equivalency bullshyt you are going on about is ludicrous. If democrats controlled both the house and senate for more than two years I guarantee you we would of had single payer by now too.

 

[88m3]

Breh, you're stating every answer except the obvious one. Peace breh, I'll let you do you.

there is no one answer why can't you deal with it?


Are you seeing how cutting food stamps is detrimental to the economy yet or no?

 

[blackzeus]

there is no one answer why can't you deal with it?


Are you seeing how cutting food stamps is detrimental to the economy yet or no?

Breh, commodity prices go up and down everyday but you're arguing how prices can only go up. So why continue to debate? Do you breh

 

[blackzeus]

Democrats can't do shyt because of white voters that keep voting in republicans and far right ones at that. Until whites decide to start voting for centrist or left leaning republicans, democrats will have no reason to go even further to the left. It's because of white people that keep voting in republicans that we have gridlock in congress that doesn't allow shyt to get done. This false equivalency bullshyt you are going on about is ludicrous. If democrats controlled both the house and senate for more than two years I guarantee you we would of had single payer by now too.

Somebody gets it

 

[88m3]

Breh, commodity prices go up and down everyday but you're arguing how prices can only go up. So why continue to debate? Do you breh

Is cutting food stamps good for the economy or bad?

 

[blackzeus]

Is cutting food stamps good for the economy or bad?

What does being good/bad for the economy have to do with rising/falling commodity prices? One is disposible income/cost of living, the other is supply and demand of goods. You can be rich as f*ck and not want to buy an iPad, supply and demand can be associated with state of economy only when sh*t is rough, but in reality one has nothing to do with the other.

With that said, to answer your question, in theory, it's good for the economy, because less you have to spend on food, more you have to spend on other things. But this is assuming you have a budget surplus, meaning you have money to blow, and it's better for you to give the food stamps, then to have the hit on disposible income of your citizens. If you are in a budget deficit like we are, it's not helping the economy because that money has to come from somewhere, so eventually you have to raise taxes or tariffs, both of which will hurt your economy. In short, there is no simple answer, you have to run the numbers to see the cost factor, and if you can cover it, the same way you'd do a budget for your personal life.

 

[88m3]

What does being good/bad for the economy have to do with rising/falling commodity prices? One is disposible income/cost of living, the other is supply and demand of goods. You can be rich as f*ck and not want to buy an iPad, supply and demand can be associated with state of economy only when sh*t is rough, but in reality one has nothing to do with the other.

With that said, to answer your question, in theory, it's good for the economy, because less you have to spend on food, more you have to spend on other things. But this is assuming you have a budget surplus, meaning you have money to blow, and it's better for you to give the food stamps, then to have the hit on disposible income of your citizens. If you are in a budget deficit like we are, it's not helping the economy because that money has to come from somewhere, so eventually you have to raise taxes or tariffs, both of which will hurt your economy. In short, there is no simple answer, you have to run the numbers to see the cost factor, and if you can cover it, the same way you'd do a budget for your personal life.

@DEAD7 and you need to join a new book club.

 

[DEAD7]

Breh, you're stating every answer except the obvious one. Peace breh, I'll let you do you.

Simple supply and demand economics is like quantum physics to most liberals. You are wasting your time. All they are going to do is call you an idiot...

 

[88m3]

Simple supply and demand economics is like quantum physics to most liberals. You are wasting your time. All they are going to do is call you an idiot...

Says the guy who lives in Fresno.

 

[DEAD7]

Says the guy who lives in Fresno.

How is that even relevant?

This niqqa is flailing.


Google supply and demand and read up, you're embarrassing yourself.

 

[Type Username Here]

Democrats can't do shyt because of white voters that keep voting in republicans and far right ones at that. Until whites decide to start voting for centrist or left leaning republicans, democrats will have no reason to go even further to the left. It's because of white people that keep voting in republicans that we have gridlock in congress that doesn't allow shyt to get done. This false equivalency bullshyt you are going on about is ludicrous. If democrats controlled both the house and senate for more than two years I guarantee you we would of had single payer by now too.

False. You wouldn't have a public option. That was negotiated amongst Democrats before it was even proposed. This is common knowledge by now.

Having all three locked up for two years is a lot of time. All we got in those two years were mainly moderate to conservative policies pushed by Democrats.

Now, do you wish me to provide documentation on corporate welfare and corporate support provided by the Obama Administration outside of legislative battles in Congress? There is plenty of that . Your kind always seems to forget that.

Do we wish to go back to the Clinton Era and look at the corporate policy? The Clinton era's appeasement of Conservative Principles? Or do you wish to go to the 80s and have a closer look at the Reagan Democrats?

 

[kingdizzy01]

yall arguing over bullshyt

we're gettin fukked either way, dems or repubs.

the attack on american citizens by the gov has been happening since at least 2001 . the cuts that are being made pretty much across the board tell u the direction we're heading.

its a wrap for the US.

 

[blackzeus]

yall arguing over bullshyt

we're gettin fukked either way, dems or repubs.

the attack on american citizens by the gov has been happening since at least 2001 . the cuts that are being made pretty much across the board tell u the direction we're heading.

its a wrap for the US.