I thought sure i saw chaves and guerrero ranked in top 10 not too long ago...they cant be that far off.
Ok...provide your Top 10 WWs with Postol included.
I thought sure i saw chaves and guerrero ranked in top 10 not too long ago...they cant be that far off.
He respected Porter's power/aggression.
Crawford fights nothing like Porter does & would fight on the outside against Broner...with slower hands & less power than Broner has. Crawford will get countered & have to come off the canvas against Broner.
He's not outboxing Broner.
140.01lbs - 147lbs is Welterweight...Broner/Porter was a Welterweight fight.
Disagree a lot with thisBroner is also more accurate puncher & a better counter puncher.
Ok...provide your Top 10 WWs with Postol included.
Didn't say he is better but he would have a chance against them. People undtertestimate how well schooled and awkward that guy is. If his soul wasn't taken last Saturday you will see that this guy will remain i the top 5 of jr. wwNikka said postol is on the same level of porter and Maidana
These bud stans gonna be when t craw stop fighting bums and midgets
um broner not light years faster than Crawford.
and its not just the porter fight breh. broner doesn't throw a lot of punches imo....he gonna be tryna pot shot n shyt. look pretty and stand back and marvel at his work.
broner never faced a guy that turn to orthatdox to southpaw...he aint figuring out Crawford. he could never outbox him.
nikka had competitive rounds ponce who aint no master boxer. cause he just was tryna get one shot in here in there. broner always been too inactive imo.
I think you overrate Broner. He hasn't even faced such a good pure boxer. Malignaggi is not that in my book (and he barely beat him)Nobody will beat Broner by outboxing him. If Crawford's power doesn't effect AB, he loses
so you are well aware of the limits of the weight divisions huh? title or non title
If a featherweight has your legs buckling, I'd say your chin is a little suspectbased off gamboa or something else?
But he's faster...just like Gamboa's speed in comparison to Crawford's.
But his connect % is always high, which means he operates off punches landed over punches thrown & that's what matters in a fight...who lands the cleaner, more effective punches.
He spars with Hank Lundy...who does it all the time. Matter of fact, ain't that how Crawford caught him (when Lundy switched)
He had competitive rounds with a 2x Champion with a 41-2 record...when Broner was just 21 years old & in his 20th career fight
He wouldnt have any problems with PDL in 2016.
Crawford only had 8 fights before he turned 22
I think you overrate Broner. He hasn't even faced such a good pure boxer. Malignaggi is not that in my book (and he barely beat him)
Crawford would probably not KO him but a wide UD, I can't imagine a scenario where Broner wins out of a lucky punch I think Crawford is clearly levels above of him.
Yeah I'M high on Crawford btw... Problem?
I think Spence, Pac and Thurman would give him hard time in ww, maybe Porter too because he is awkward af but I would favor him in all these fights and he would beat the others pretty comfortably.
I doN't say Bradley cause they won't ever fight each other
Dude...you said Postol beats Porter, Maidana, & Broner.
You said Postols win over Matthysse = Swifts.
You said Postol best win > Broner's...but forget that Malignaggi beat Judah who beat Matthysse.
I think you just hard right now.
Dude...you said Postol beats Porter, Maidana, & Broner.
You said Postols win over Matthysse = Swifts.
You said Postol best win > Broner's...but forget that Malignaggi beat Judah who beat Matthysse.
I think you just hard right now.
Let me say Swifts W over Ghost = Thurmans tho...muhfukkers would be all up in my mentions