and that's exactly why I can't take Bud serious. Easy to say who belongs on the p4p list, when he's been grandfathered on to that shyt by beating the likes of Postol and Gamboa and never having to ever face a real live threat his damn self.
Oh no I fully agree, but even a broken clock is right twice a day.
My issue with Crawford is mainly his fans making this nikka out to be boxing Jesus acting like he can literally do everything in the ring and that he done ran through some killers to get where he is today. Dude dominates and has dominated the same level of competition every elite fighter does.
If Crawford even had a Danny Garcia at 140 level win on his resume I wouldn't give him so much shyt about the shyt he talks, but he aint fought nobody to act like he some boxing godfather and shyt the way he do.
Nope same result, split draw. He had Castano winning already so a 10-9 round would’ve just had him winning by a bigger margin.Without Weisfeld giving a 10-8, this would have been a MD right ? Same outcome as SD ?
It's the shyt that's pushing fight fans more towards UFC
Exactly, plus it don't help that you got nikkas like Bread saying Postol is on the same level as Castano talent and skill wise
To be fair they both beat good but not great opponents but one beat all of em dominantly, the other one not, even lost to one of them, debatably but lost, couldn't won dominant. Bud has beaten Harrison, Rosario, old Trout level of opponents too, just not elite guys and he beat em without a doubt.and that's exactly why I can't take Bud serious. Easy to say who belongs on the p4p list, when he's been grandfathered on to that shyt by beating the likes of Postol and Gamboa and never having to ever face a real live threat his damn self.
Ah yeah, misread it and thought he had Charlo 114-113Nope same result, split draw. He had Castano winning already so a 10-9 round would’ve just had him winning by a bigger margin.
That's why I don't take what he says as gospel like a lot of nikkas do.