4 Idaho college students killed in "worst crime we've ever seen". Suspect arrested 12/30

Voice of Reason

Veteran
Joined
Jan 7, 2016
Messages
44,114
Reputation
258
Daps
125,011
It's dope that they caught they finally caught the killer, but it's still the concerning aspect of law enforcement having to genealogy databases and the potential privacy concerns that come along with it. It will have to be addressed at some point, but this situation isn't the one to do so.



People don’t care because they are too dumb or too distracted to care. No one cares about all the government spying that Snowden leaked 10 years ago.
 

Stick Up Kid

Veteran
WOAT
Joined
Aug 29, 2012
Messages
30,284
Reputation
-14,422
Daps
147,450
Reppin
Newark NJ
Top 20 (in no particular order)

Whitney Houston
Michael Jackson
Janet Jackson
Brian McKnight
Mariah Carey
Luther Vandross
Ron Isley
Anita Baker
Justin Timberlake
Lauryn Hill
Bob Marley
Beyonce
Christina Aguilera
Alicia Keys
Usher
Minnie Riperton
Erykah Badu
Keyshia Cole
Faith Evans
Mary J. Blige

Are you saying these are the people he should’ve killed?
 

Macallik86

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
6,502
Reputation
1,372
Daps
21,220
There's something seriously different about incel cats. The term incel gets thrown very loosely on this forum, so it completely devalues and generalizes the term to folks I genuinely don't think are incels. This forum is likely filled with dry dikk dudes, shyt, the vast majority of the population of men suffer from dry dikk syndrome; even dudes in relationships got dry dikk, however, I truly don't believe anybody on this forum is doing this type or mass violence anytime soon.

We have to be a bit more specific about these people and point out similar characteristic. Seems to me many are on the spectrum, social outcasts, probably had spoiled childhoods where everything was given to them, tend to frequent echo chambers, demonic sites like 4.... Very strange
I hear you, but dry dikk dudes is what incel is.

Involuntarily celibate. Most serial killers are incels, but most incels aren't serial killers... the vast majority are online complaining about women and have misogynistic tendencies.

Here's an entry from Urban Dictionary in 2017 that sounds like a coli breh:
Abbreviated term for the compound 'Involuntary Celibate'. In Darwinian terms a person deemed 'least fit to reproduce', manifested in social terms as someone unable to copulate due to the absence of even a single willing partner. More typically male than female. Hangs around on internet forums generally blaming females for this undesirable condition. Unable to compete on the level playing field of sexual equality can be seen clamouring for a return to the middle ages where all that was needed to nab a woman was two cows and a quarter acre. Could be considered a 'Darwinian loser' whose gene pool is facing extinction unless they address negative personality traits and/or get into physical condition necessary for attraction to opposite sex.
Woman: He's nice enough but he identifies as one of those incels.

Friend: Stay away from him. That's akin to announcing oneself as an unreformable loser.
by YoungCarl November 17, 2017

So no, I don't think the term is being abused as it has never been solely for murderous people that don't get p*ssy.
 

Raw Lyrics

Sunset Park
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
7,872
Reputation
2,786
Daps
29,579
Reppin
Brooklyn
It really don’t matter but I want to know why he didn’t kill the entire house


On fourChan, he said that he couldn't account for who was downstairs - he only targeted two people (female students who were waitresses at a downtown restaurant), the other two people only got killed cuz they happened to be there.
 

Fillerguy

Veteran
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
18,524
Reputation
4,195
Daps
77,151
Reppin
North Jersey
It's dope that they caught they finally caught the killer, but it's still the concerning aspect of law enforcement having to genealogy databases and the potential privacy concerns that come along with it. It will have to be addressed at some point, but this situation isn't the one to do so.
It was public database though. And they don't even need to know if its your DNA though, just distant relative. From there, a process of elimination out of potentially thousands. Its how they found the Golden State Killer. A private investigator narrowed it down, stalked the potential suspects and took their DNA from shed hair/restaurant cups.
 

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
42,792
Reputation
3,020
Daps
131,885
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
It was public database though. And they don't even need to know if its your DNA though, just distant relative. From there, a process of elimination out of potentially thousands. Its how they found the Golden State Killer. A private investigator narrowed it down, stalked the potential suspects and took their DNA from shed hair/restaurant cups.
I know how they use it to solve those crimes, but it still doesn’t make me feel better about the potential privacy concerns that come along with it especially since there are no set rules and regulations for what they can/can’t do.

Remember the one chick who got raped and the police used her DNA to hem her up for another crime that was irrelevant to the topic at hand.
 

NotAnFBIagent

[redacted]
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
32,868
Reputation
5,300
Daps
144,281
It's dope that they caught they finally caught the killer, but it's still the concerning aspect of law enforcement having to genealogy databases and the potential privacy concerns that come along with it. It will have to be addressed at some point, but this situation isn't the one to do so.
My brother just found out he has a teenage son through our sister being on ancestry.com
 

Stick Up Kid

Veteran
WOAT
Joined
Aug 29, 2012
Messages
30,284
Reputation
-14,422
Daps
147,450
Reppin
Newark NJ
I know how they use it to solve those crimes, but it still doesn’t make me feel better about the potential privacy concerns that come along with it especially since there are no set rules and regulations for what they can/can’t do.

Remember the one chick who got raped and the police used her DNA to hem her up for another crime that was irrelevant to the topic at hand.

So the DNA got her arrested for a crime she committed? So what’s the issue
 

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
42,792
Reputation
3,020
Daps
131,885
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
So the DNA got her arrested for a crime she committed? So what’s the issue
Her DNA was supposed to be used to help catch her rapist hence her giving it to them in the first place. How would you like it if you gave your DNA to someone and they used it against your wishes? A lot of have a problem with it and they’d be lying if they said otherwise.

Let law enforcement overstep their boundaries especially against minorities and watch how a lot people’s tune changes.
 
Top