Bigblackted4
Superstar
You must be in New Jersey smh
3/16 SHO PPV: Errol Spence vs. Mikey Garcia fight is ON! (IBF Welterweight Title)
- Thread starter Recca Gatsby
- Start date
Bigblackted4
Superstar
Put y’all avi where y’all fingers are then
Yup, and hell you don't even need Spence to use that strategy better, because Porter barely used it effectively himself. nikka wasn't jabbing or anything. Just basically pressuring with hooks and overhands.To his credit that shyt still won him 4-5 rds, but almost doesn't count. Keith pretty much fought down to Porter's level and won 2 extra rounds just off of ring generalship in order to win that fight.
I don't even wanna see a rematch because Porter fights like he afraid of getting hit now. Dude ain't never used to do all that backpeddling and running around the ring until after that Thurman fight. Granados was backing him up.
and we don't even know if Spence can even take the bombs Porter took from Thurman either and Thurman definitely punches better than Brook. Thurman might cuff some hooks, but them right hands are a different story.
man thurman is b level at best, his performances with guerrero, lopez, collazo, bundu, porter, garcia were all tough fights for him all of them, he was never fighting down to the level of his competition, he was just able to use his legs to get away when he needed to which is why he tired out in all those fights and lost his punching power, spence will hawk him down relentlessly, what makes you think Thurman punches harder than Brook lmao, Brook is the biggest welterweight manhandled Porter who was the smaller weaker guy, which is why that bulldozing shyt didn't work
Thurman couldn't put away fukking guerrro man, and you think he gonna get spence out of there lmao, nikkaz is mad dumb, Lopez damn near KO'd that guy, he won't go six with spence
Knicksman20
Superstar
When did I shyt on Porter or say he's better than Spence?
Porter's different type of "physical" fighter than Spence & unpredictable at times. And Thurman saying he could've used his jab more is common sense. He could've made that fight easier & probably would've hurt Porter more had he used it & he still won clean. At the pro level Spence hasn't had to deal with a high IQ fighter that has a plan B/C or a fighter that can give him a different look or make him think more. That's what Thurman can do (not to mention at some point he's going to catch Spence with something big if they fight) & Mikey can more than likely do. It all comes down to if Mikey can take what Spence gives out
Bigblackted4
Superstar
Bigblackted4
Superstar
Running is not a plan B, I think Thurman’s boxing is so overrated he’s just physically superior to the fighters he’s fought, better feet then all and quicker but when he fights Crawford or Spence or even Brook. We will see if he can change levels. He’s done it against supremely flawed and one dimensional opponents that can’t make it up with supreme physical talents. Also Mikey couldn’t even knockout Easter or Broner but I’m to expect he hurts Spence.When did I shyt on Porter or say he's better than Spence?
Porter's different type of "physical" fighter than Spence & unpredictable at times. And Thurman saying he could've used his jab more is common sense. He could've made that fight easier & probably would've hurt Porter more had he used it & he still won clean. At the pro level Spence hasn't had to deal with a high IQ fighter that has a plan B/C or a fighter that can give me a different look or make him think more. That's what Thurman can do (not to mention at some point he's going to catch Spence with something big if they fight) & Mikey can more than likely do. It all comes down to if Mikey can take what Spence gives out
malbaker86
Gators
You don't believe that
Knicksman20
Superstar
No offense bro but you sound like a casual. All fighters are flawed but it's up to the fighter to exploit those flaws
And about Easter or Broner, when have they EVER been KO'ed
? The only time Ester was "down" was (his glove didn't touch the canvas) against Richard Commey who's a big puncher & the only time AB was down was against Maidana who's a huge puncherI know that for facts, Thurman won't be able to run, Spence will be the first guy he fights who will cut the ring off and he won't be able to run
Spence is an elite fighter, meaning he has elite level skill and elite level athleticism, this is what makes him so above the rest of these guys, he won't lose to anyone but somebody like that
malbaker86
Gators
And THAT'S my thing too. I can't imagine a world where he buzzes or buckles Spence. I won't say it's impossible, but I cant see it happening
Knicksman20
Superstar
No offense bro but you sound like a casual. All fighters are flawed but it's up to the fighter to exploit those flaws
And about Easter or Broner, when have they EVER been KO'ed
plus Spence takes more offensive chances than those two nikkas.
Both Broner and Easter stopped really trying to win at a certain point and just wanted to survive. The chances of clipping dudes like that are lower than a nikka that is coming at you constantly.
Bigblackted4
Superstar
No offense bro but you sound like a casual. All fighters are flawed but it's up to the fighter to exploit those flaws
And about Easter or Broner, when have they EVER been KO'ed
That’s my point Mikey doesn’t punch harder than either how is to hurt Spence.
Duh everybody has flaws but the fighters he fought at the supposedly top level were flawed and had already been exposed by that point see Danny Garcia vs Peterson or Porter vs Brook. I was just saying I want to see him change levels against somebody that we haven’t seen exposed.
Bigblackted4
Superstar
So you think Mikey wins this fightNo offense bro but you sound like a casual. All fighters are flawed but it's up to the fighter to exploit those flaws
And about Easter or Broner, when have they EVER been KO'ed
Bigblackted4
Superstar
By the way no offense to anybody this is just an argument I’ve been having for years with my bro he’s a Thurman Stan and I’ve just never seen it so maybe I’m just missing the boat