2024 U.S. Presidential Election Thread: Donald Trump wins & will return to the White House; GOP wins U.S. Senate & U.S. House
- Thread starter FAH1223
- Start date
The situation for Gen Z is going to be depend on their rough socioecnonomic status. How great did millennials have it? Climate change? All that is way over the top for convo I was ever interested in having via the article. How many of them are just creating content and trendy phrases for content? That's what Tok Tok is, that's what Tik Tok does. Your take seems to be it's all legit and it's all genuine and anything else is me championing the elite, that's not who I see the convo.
Allow them? This is where I just lose the convo thread. There's nothing to suggest that from my posts. The narrative that you are running with is like a combative binary stance, and I am not on the other end of it.
mastermind
Rest In Power Kobe
You say this:
I am starting to think you believe the economy isn't bad for young people.
Yet create this which wasn't in the article:
I am starting to think you believe the economy isn't bad for young people.
You say this:
Yet create this which wasn't in the article:
I am starting to think you believe the economy isn't bad for young people.
I guess I didn't think there would be this binary reaction from anyone, like it's a really insulting article. Given my knowledge of social media and how it works, I was fascianted by the idea of people talking about vibe cession and quiet recession, in the same manner that they make videos about gossip, or fashion, or their day to day dramas. Like I thought this was really interesting, as it relates to human pyshcology and social media, the election, and campaigning.
At no time, am I interested in defending or attacking young people, or defending or attacking the Biden admin. Or debating the foundations of the economy, good or bad. That's just not where my mind ever was on this topic.
mastermind
Rest In Power Kobe
The article says the economy isn’t that bad and young people need to get off tiktok and you thought it wouldnt illicit a response?
I keep asking, why did they choose this topic to make a point about social media brainwashing and who Is the actual audience for this article?
I want to give you the benefit of a doubt, but you keep on going in deeper lol.
You shared it in a thread about the 2024 presidential election and the article writers has a different take on the economy versus those it’s criticizing.
ADevilYouKhow
Rhyme Reason
An appeals court has struck down a key path for enforcing the Voting Rights Act — NPR
Who can sue to enforce key voting protections for people of color under the Voting Rights Act could be severely limited by a lawsuit out of Arkansas, which may be headed for the U.S. Supreme Court.
apple.news
Not good
I read it again, and it seems fairly even handed to me, still, I think it's laughable to suggest it's inflammatory, when they give space to both positions and fairly nuanced takes from both positions. To me, it's more you who is dug in and passionate on this issue. Like the NY Times is Breitbart now. it honestly isn't me. we can just leave it there.
Its going to the Supreme Court.. that was always the plan
An appeals court has struck down a key path for enforcing the Voting Rights Act — NPR
Who can sue to enforce key voting protections for people of color under the Voting Rights Act could be severely limited by a lawsuit out of Arkansas, which may be headed for the U.S. Supreme Court.
Not good
Just so scotus can kill it even more.
They ain’t that stupid lmaoo
They upheld the last voting rights case that came before them
They have overturned several cases that were settled case law. See roe vs wade
