Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
40,977
Reputation
21,193
Daps
128,392
The argument is factual. The money itself is not the problem, it's what the money buys. You choose to not give Liz the benefit of the doubt. I look at her entire career, her political vision, and how she's run her Primary campaign fundraising vehicle and find her credible. Sanders will not refuse DNC and establishment money if he wins the Primary. You believe that will make him compromised. I do not, because I find him credible.

:manny:

The argument is factual from a theoretical perspective. Warren dodges increasing the military budget knowing it further funds the MIC. She sent letters to donors telling them not to worry and is taking backroom meetings with Clinton. Plus, everyone knows, including her, that taking donor money automatically has a string attached. So if she's willingly taking the money, then she's gonna be beholden to somebody. IE. corrupted (even if it's a little bit, it's still corruption).
 
Top