Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
41,087
Reputation
21,318
Daps
128,861
And that makes more sense financially and economically than covering them and allowing them to partake in preventive care? I don't think that adds up my G.
:what:

You my guy, so I'm not gonna spazz out on you. But you definitely misread my 1st post.
 

Supercoolmayo

Superstar
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
13,031
Reputation
8,980
Daps
54,484
Reppin
Master Roshi's Island
Warren and Sanders are the only two people who are running campaigns in such a way that when they are in the office they won’t be beholden to all the same stakeholders. I don’t get how everyone doesn’t see that and that the beef between the two camps is just internet weirdo shyt.

Because they are proabably siphoning each others votes
 

Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
41,087
Reputation
21,318
Daps
128,861
Oh OK, where did I go wrong?
That health care for illegal Immigrants stance need to change. :francis:

As terrible as it may sound, it just makes sense, financially and economically, if you're gonna implement nationwide health insurance.

So there's no further misunderstanding, what's in red is a separate thought from the blue. I'll clear it up though: It makes sense, financially and economically, to cover illegals if you're gonna implement nationwide health insurance.

EDIT: I can see how that can be misinterpreted.
 
Last edited:

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
46,430
Reputation
7,078
Daps
147,699
Reppin
CookoutGang
I’m not your errand boy, go do your own research clown since your dumbass can’t remember what was said during the debates. They will only deport criminals, but everyone else can stay once they get here.
You clearly must not know that the majority of deportations are from civil cases.
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
46,430
Reputation
7,078
Daps
147,699
Reppin
CookoutGang
@Atlrocafella I guess maybe some education is in order for you.

The proposal by Castro, as you pointed out is to remove the federal misdemeanor illegal entry/crossing.

The reasoning behind it is that statute places illegal immigrants in the federal court back log that really isn't designed to catch and deport immigrants in a fast manor. It's also the statue used for family separations.

And practically there's this:

Does this mean Democrats want open borders? In practice, no. Border authorities routinely handle illegal border crossers using the civil immigration laws, which allow many different ways to deport migrants who don’t have legal papers. Prosecuting illegal entry crimes places huge burdens on the federal courts, taking resources away from prosecutions of other crimes like narcotics trafficking and money laundering.

So naturally, if federal court isn't handling thee cases, then who is?

Simple answer, it's immigration court. And what is immigration court?

The immigration court system is the entity in which immigration judges conduct removal proceedings and adjudicate asylum claims for immigrants, among other responsibilities.It is operated by the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), under the power of the Attorney General. EOIR is comprised of 58 courts throughout the U.S. and the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), an appellate body. The immigration courts are civil courts. Article III federal courts which have jurisdiction over cases concerning criminal offenses, including instances when federal prosecutors seek criminal charges for immigration offenses, such as illegal entry or reentry, are not considered part of the immigration court system.
In the grand scheme of things the law is fairly new and in no way changes out ability to capture, arrest and deport undocumented immigrants.

What it has done is led to numerous humanitarian crisis in its 90 year history.



 

Skooby

Alone In My Zone
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
25,381
Reputation
10,329
Daps
60,177
Reppin
The Cosmos
did you try opening it in incog mode? works for some paywalls, but others have gotten hip to it

edit: just found a paywall bypass extension on github, but i don't know how you feel about installing unknown dev tools iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-chrome
Just tried it. Didn't work. Looks like Washington Post caught on.

Maybe I'll try that link at some point. Thanks.
Amazon prime?
I have Prime but I would still have to pay for the Washington Post.
 

dtownreppin214

l'immortale
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
56,025
Reputation
10,647
Daps
192,913
Reppin
Shags & Leathers
That’s a fact, and there should be no open borders. Do not incentivize crossing the border by making it a civil offense. It needs to remain a criminal offense, punishable by jail and deportation. The majority of the country is not going for that open border bullshyt.
Dems only gain voters by adopting this common sense approach. They are gaining NO NEW VOTERS by advocating for open borders, healthcare for illegals and speaking spanish at debates. They are playing themselves by moving so far left on this issue.
 
Last edited:

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
46,430
Reputation
7,078
Daps
147,699
Reppin
CookoutGang
I think you get 6/mo free with prime as a trial. Afterwards it auto-renewed for 3.99 a month for me.

Not sure if that promo and rste is still active @Skooby
 

dtownreppin214

l'immortale
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
56,025
Reputation
10,647
Daps
192,913
Reppin
Shags & Leathers
Obama made every race closer than normal in 2008.
Yeah I know a lot of that was because of Obama + Bush hatred. I think he'l win comfortably. For some reason Mitch's unfavorables have improved quite a bit in the last year. They were in the 60's last July, now they're in the 40's.

It's sad that the faith of our democracy lies in the hands of a few million inbreds in Kentucky.
 
Top