Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,593
Stop trying to flip this about Stacey it’s about you coming out your mouth again about how anyone who doesn’t support Biden isn’t black or is a conservative.

Also don’t project.

:hhh:

THe consistent tap dancing you’ve done for a man whose been in power for decades and never done shyt for black people but saying we should all get down because he might take Stacey as VP makes you a clown or a paid agent. I could see if you were a homosexual this caping for Biden since he and Obama did a shyt ton for them when they were in power.


On one hand you promote a Bernie and Warren, and then try to say Biden hasn’t done shyt for black ppl.

lol he’s done way more than anything Bernie or Liz have done. Two senators who come from the whitest states in America :mjlol:

fukk outta here, Biden had a black agenda the same decade Bernie won a mayoral election in a cac town with 98% white ppl.


Yet I’m tap dancing for Biden. Projecting nikka, u supposedly are pro black supporting a candidate who has said zero pro black messages before 2016 while in office :why:.


y’all Nikkas are so lost son. :snoop:


Biden runs circles around Bernie/Warren with actually helping any type of black specific agenda while in office. Not some trickle down liberalism ideas that say I’ll help white poor ppl and a byproduct of my agenda means it’ll help black ppl too. :sas2:


You can say nothing about ur candidate helping the black community before they ran for President bc it doesn’t fukking exist. :ufdup:
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
103,417
Reputation
13,803
Daps
301,445
Reppin
NULL
People forget how much Hillary crushed Bernie in the primaries most times.
she also bought and paid for the 2016 nomination in the aftermath of 2008 :ehh: so when 2016 came around, the DNC had made it clear to the rest of the party that it was not up for contest

unless you believe that it's just a coincidence that we had 23 candidates run this year, but in 2016 "no one felt like running" that year :mjlol:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
314,780
Reputation
-34,223
Daps
624,389
Reppin
The Deep State
she also bought and paid for the 2016 nomination in the aftermath of 2008 :ehh: so when 2016 came around, the DNC had made it clear to the rest of the party that it was not up for contest

unless you believe that it's just a coincidence that we had 23 candidates run this year, but in 2016 "no one felt like running" that year :mjlol:
oh yea fukk boy? How did she pay for it?
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
103,417
Reputation
13,803
Daps
301,445
Reppin
NULL
oh yea fukk boy? How did she pay for it?
the money and favors and influence offered by the clinton political machine :dahell: it was always crazy to me that you get so offended about this blatant fact

i'll reiterate again, your position is what exactly? in 2020 we have 23 prominent governors, senators and congressmen running... but in 2016, it was just a coincidence that NO ONE had that energy besides lincoln chafee? :laff:

stop playing stupid, breh. you look like a fukkin fool
 
Last edited:

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
314,780
Reputation
-34,223
Daps
624,389
Reppin
The Deep State
the money and favors and influence offered by the clinton political machine :dahell: it was always crazy to me that you get so offended about this blatant fact

i'll reiterate again, your position is what exactly? in 2020 we have 23 prominent governors, senators and congressmen running... but in 2016, it was just a coincidence that no one had that energy besides lincoln chafee? :laff:

stop playing stupid, breh. you look like a fukkin fool
Oh ok, you don't have an answer.

Hillary was the most popular politician in the country in for three years consecutively before she ran in 2016 and there were other candidates. They failed.

Only reason we have so many candidates this year is the urgency of removing trump.

You fukking bytchass loser.

Goddamn you people are useless.
 

Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
41,513
Reputation
21,418
Daps
129,965
Hillary was the most popular politician in the country in for three years consecutively before she ran in 2016 and there were other candidates. They failed.

Warren was more popular than her. Let's keep it a buck. The party decided that it was Clinton's time just like The GOP decided it was Romney's time. Plus, let's not pretend that the Clinton machine don't have heavy pull in the DNC and Dems in general.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
314,780
Reputation
-34,223
Daps
624,389
Reppin
The Deep State
Warren was more popular than her. Let's keep it a buck. The party decided that it was Clinton's time just like The GOP decided it was Romney's time. Plus, let's not pretend that the Clinton machine don't have heavy pull in the DNC and Dems in general.
Yeah. The former First Lady, senator, and Secretary of State was just gonna sit on her hands compared to a freshman senator

:dead:
 

South Paw

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
35,027
Reputation
1,910
Daps
40,258
Reppin
CML
she also bought and paid for the 2016 nomination in the aftermath of 2008 :ehh: so when 2016 came around, the DNC had made it clear to the rest of the party that it was not up for contest

unless you believe that it's just a coincidence that we had 23 candidates run this year, but in 2016 "no one felt like running" that year :mjlol:
Wasn't it the "super delegates" that got her the nomination?
 
Top