For instance, let's say that there was finally a 16 team playoff implemented.
All of the scheduling, money issues aside, we're looking at THE BEST TEAMS
1 Notre Dame
2 Alabama
3 Georgia
4 Florida
5 Oregon
6 Kansas State
7 LSU
8 Stanford
9 Texas A&M
10 South Carolina
11 Oklahoma
12 Nebraska
13 Florida State
14 Clemson
15 Oregon State
16 UCLA
Hypothetically, there's no "bowl ban" on Ohio State as well, so they're up there
mix and match to make some seedings, and you've got a fukking amazing post-season
and like I previously stated, you could even have the equivalent of the NIT for CFB to keep the smaller bowls relevant and smaller schools in there.
Once you do away with pre-season rankings and ranking teams before Week 6, you're looking at some at-large teams sneaking there way around there somewhere.
This would keep the regular season competitive.
I would also think that the NCAA would be interested in this because it would slow down the expansion of the mega-conferences as the regular season would obviously be shortened
All of the scheduling, money issues aside, we're looking at THE BEST TEAMS
1 Notre Dame
2 Alabama
3 Georgia
4 Florida
5 Oregon
6 Kansas State
7 LSU
8 Stanford
9 Texas A&M
10 South Carolina
11 Oklahoma
12 Nebraska
13 Florida State
14 Clemson
15 Oregon State
16 UCLA
Hypothetically, there's no "bowl ban" on Ohio State as well, so they're up there
mix and match to make some seedings, and you've got a fukking amazing post-season
and like I previously stated, you could even have the equivalent of the NIT for CFB to keep the smaller bowls relevant and smaller schools in there.
Once you do away with pre-season rankings and ranking teams before Week 6, you're looking at some at-large teams sneaking there way around there somewhere.
This would keep the regular season competitive.
I would also think that the NCAA would be interested in this because it would slow down the expansion of the mega-conferences as the regular season would obviously be shortened