Jonathan is shrewd. He knows that if he comments on the Baga massacre, more Nigerians will know about the 2000 dead. He keeps mum because he hopes the Nigerian electorate will forget in a few weeks.
If I lived in Arewa, I would view Jonathan's government as criminal in regard to its inability to provide security. The Emir of Kano, Sanusi, was correct in telling Northerners to arms themselves. Obviously, the Nigerian government won't.
We must critically look at the Nigerian Army's inability to provide logistical support to its troops. I'm reading books on the US Civil War. The Union Army got thousands of mules, horses, trains etc. to transport food, ammunition, clothing and the like to its armies in the mid 19th century. The Union Army of 1865 puts to shame the Nigerian Army of 2015, which has at its disposal 21st century technology.
Why don't we have a military strategy to secure Nigeria's borders? That way, we starve Boko Haram of foreign support, materiel and manpower?
Why haven't we recruited tens of thousands of new soldiers to secure the North? 20,000 soldiers won't do it. We need at least a 10-to-1 advantage over Boko Haram. I estimate there's around 15,000 to 20,000 Boko Haram fighters therefore we need to double or triple the size of Nigerian army. Hasn't happened.
Why do our general retreat from our own territory? Why don't we outflank Boko Haram? Why do we wait for them to attack garrisons instead of taking the battle to them? Why aren't bad generals fired?
Nigeria's military leadership
I don't know much about Nigerian political/military history, but I heard that the main reason Nigerian forces are under funded is the fear a coup d'etat will take place. The existing Government and existing president, Goodluck Jonathan are ensuring their status by not giving the Nigerian military too much power. And this is all at the expense of the country's growing instability.