Playaz Eyez
Veteran
.
Goldberg with the stored finishers lol
Goldberg with the stored finishers lol
It didn't deliver though.
This is what I'm saying lmao there's no justifying this in any wayNo brehs, there's no spinning this
This was a waste of a main event. Miss me with the whole "Goldberg matches were always short" argument
yeah, against lower card wrestlers
Goldberg winning is not the problem, the way he won is. Made Lesnar look like a joke. Goldberg's matches with guys from the power plant were longer than this.
Now I'm hearing the rematch needs to happen....why? He's 2-0 against lesnar and the 2nd win is Braun vs Jobber status
3 hours into a show, after an insane 52 minute match, who really wanted to see Goldberg and Brock go back and forth trading holds? Or worse still, a bunch of german suplexes?
I can only speak for myself, but what I wanted out of Goldberg vs Brock was 1) Goldberg's entrance and 2) "a moment".
They delivered on both accounts. The second thing on my list was only enhanced by it being a squash that NOBODY was expecting. If they would have padded it out with 5-10 minutes of clumsy "WWE main event" action, the moment would have been diminished.
There's no way of knowing, but I'd guess that the crowd reaction after that 1 minute squash was better than it would have been after a 10 minute match between these two.
3 hours into a show, after an insane 52 minute match, who really wanted to see Goldberg and Brock go back and forth trading holds? Or worse still, a bunch of german suplexes?
I can only speak for myself, but what I wanted out of Goldberg vs Brock was 1) Goldberg's entrance and 2) "a moment".
They delivered on both accounts. The second thing on my list was only enhanced by it being a squash that NOBODY was expecting. If they would have padded it out with 5-10 minutes of clumsy "WWE main event" action, the moment would have been diminished.
There's no way of knowing, but I'd guess that the crowd reaction after that 1 minute squash was better than it would have been after a 10 minute match between these two.
That's my pointIt's your opinion. I ain't gonna call you names about it breh
I can go "obscure facts and useless wrestling knowledge" with anyone here but. ..
I'm fine with a wrestler getting caught slipping, it's good to be made to feel like you don't know everything that's gonna happen once in a while.
Boxing is real. This isn't. Anyone who wants to pretend like the main event delivered is a fool.
Brock inexplicably lost to Cena and HHH, he hasn't been an unstoppable monster in a long time, even though the WWE have tried to erase and rewrite history, as if 2013 wasn't just 3 years ago.
Whatever good came from the breaking the streak was wasted by the time they got to WM the next year and didn't pull the trigger on Roman beating him. And his monster run and must see attraction has nothing to do with the streak, and everything to do with him coming back to WWE as a REAL fighter who might beat the shyt out of people for real, and getting main stream attention because he was a draw for a real sport. Plus that you only see him 2-3 times a year and it's always a special event. Breaking the streak meant less than the utter destruction of John Cena, which that too was wasted the very next month when Cena not only didn't take time off, but had a rematch where he had Brock about to tap before Seth caused a DQ for no reason at all.
The streak didn't start meaning shyt until 10 matches in. We really pretending that a streak that includes wins over luminaries like 46 year old Jimmy Snuka, King Kong Bundy, Giant Gonzalez, Sid, near death Big Boss Man, A-TRAIN, etc means much?
The streak ended, Taker continued on as if nothing happened, got his win back, and is still booked exactly the same as he was before he lost it. The streak meant nothing in the end. And that was well before Goldberg came back.