1 BTC = $8.2k, it’s up 735% this yr UPDATE 5/19: BTC @ $42k :damn:
- Thread starter JordanWearinThe45
- Start date
Invest in iso 20022What you suggest we do?
Oh that's an investment? Lol. Had no idea what it was. Where do I find more info? It's a crypto?
Yes coins like XLM Xdc xrp hbar to name a few. They’re connected to cbdc’s which every country in the world will soon shift to. Its a whole thing going on in the shadows.
Last edited:
CoinDesk: Binance.US Agrees to Buy Voyager's Assets for $1.02B.
www.coindesk.com
Binance.US Agrees to Buy Voyager's Assets for $1.02B
The agreement comes after CoinDesk had reported last month that Binance was preparing a bid for Voyager's assets.
null
...
explain?
there is nothing special about moving to an xml standard for a set of financial products / transactions
FpML - Wikipedia
About – FpML
www.fpml.org
In The Zone '98
Superstar
I've provided links in all the high usage crypto threads.
null
...
what you know about xml breh?
In The Zone '98
Superstar
I know nothing. But I gladly accept new information and opinions.
This is a crypto thread. I've provided the Info that may be of interest to those INTERESTED in crypto assets.
ogc163
Superstar
This dude worked at Ripple and this thread breaks down why the ISO 20022 hype is bullshyt and being "ISO 20022 compliant" does not give these coins comparative advantage the way jokers are implying. This is the most relevant tweet of the entire thread:
CoinDesk: Binance.US Agrees to Buy Voyager's Assets for $1.02B.
Binance.US Agrees to Buy Voyager's Assets for $1.02B
The agreement comes after CoinDesk had reported last month that Binance was preparing a bid for Voyager's assets.
Hmmm interesting. I wonder how this shakes out for the former customers.
In The Zone '98
Superstar
Last edited:
null
...
i've been using xml/fpml/xmlschema etc for a while now. there is nothing special about having an agreed format. especially one which is somewhat behind the curve due to its verbosity.
ask a question, get no answer tho
ogc163
Superstar
The burden of proof of ISO 20022's relevance to crypto is on you, given that your such a cheerleader. Plus you've been spamming this ISO 20022 being a crypto gamechanger nonsense for awhile now.Given how it's become part of your shtick on here, I would reasonably expect for you to be be able to:
- understand and explain it's general application, and
- relevance of it's applications to crypto, and
- pros/cons of it's potential application, and
- provide a decent rebuttal to criticisms. (one's better than "send more articles")
In The Zone '98
Superstar
Given how it's become part of your shtick on here, I would reasonably expect for you to be be able to:
But if you can't do that I'm just going to assume you want to feel as though you have some special knowledge that will then lead to future financial success, despite not being able to explain why the thing you believe in has a probable comparative advantage.
- understand and explain it's general application, and
- relevance of it's applications to crypto, and
- pros/cons of it's potential application, and
- provide a decent rebuttal to criticisms. (one's better than "send more articles")
But I've provided links to smarter people who could explain the opinion better.
But nothing will be determined December 2022. We'll see in a couple years.