Domingo Halliburton
Handmade in USA
How did I know from the title of this thread that this was going to be some retarded shyt from 2-3 years ago?
serious question".999 [infinte]" = 1
infinite is not a number1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = 1 how?
Shouldn't 3/3 be .999 [infinte]?
I don't recall saying it was.infinite is not a number
You implied it when you represented 1/3 as .33[inf]. You basically said an rational number is an irrational number.I don't recall saying it was.
You implied it when you represented 1/3 as .33[inf]. You basically said an rational number is an irrational number.
But a rational number is not an irrational number and when adding the one cant simply ignore the irrational part. In essence 1/3 x 3 is not the same answer as .33inf × 3 by simple spplication of the rules of addition.Real numbers are numbers that can be found on the number line. This includes both the rational and irrational numbers.
Beautifully stated, but how do you esplain the multiple phenomena of quanta. Our search for basic particles relies on a digital universeNot really.
It just means that it's impossible to cut anything into exact thirds unless the universe is analog.
Even though we have evidence that the universe is digital, I still say it's analog.
Nature seems to have invented numbers within its conservation of energy paradigm, in fact in locality and causality numbers have to exist as a matter of teleological necessity.What the fukk are numbers anyway, like really, who invented that shyt?
Could a world be possible without numbers?
But that depends on the scale of relevancy, theoretically no but in the practical world there is a degree of satisfiability for any applicationWhich still leaves me feeling like 3.5 is ALMOST the same as 3.499999.
I always thought of it like 0.99999etc was so infinitely close to 1 that there is actually nothing between them.
Made me think there might be an end to a decimal number.