Resident Geordie
Rookie
Blaming America for Sunni-Shiite sectarian conflict, is logical.
Are you aware of Cheneys “redirection” in 07?
Blaming America for Sunni-Shiite sectarian conflict, is logical.
First century huh
You realize Shia wasn't even a sect, it was a tiny cult untill the 16th century right.As in, the first century of Islamic calendar, dumbass.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_calendar
But yeah, ignore everything else I posted.
You realize Shia wasn't even a sect, it was a tiny cult untill the 16th century right.
Sectarian violence and/or sectarian strife is violence inspired by sectarianism, that is, between different sects of one particular mode of ideology or religion within a nation/community. Religious segregation often plays a role in sectarian violence.
Yeah we totally use the Islamic Calender on the coli
Kick rocks fakkit
Right, only a small sect. Nothing large-scale. Except...oh wait.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Karbala
Yeah, I'd say you're wrong.
Yeah, because it's totally inappropriate to use "first century of Islam" when discussing...Islam? Especially when the Battle of Karabala is dated as being in the year 61 AH of the Islamic calendar?
Okay. Sure.
Why would you quote Karbala to a Muslim
What were the 2 sects that were fighting? Sunni and Shia? really? That is NOT what happened at Karbala at all... Furthermore Shia's were a CULT LIKE sect up untill the Safavid Dynasty in Iran in the 16th century... please stop you are going to embarrass yourself further trying to debate with me...
Lol so this dude shows me the shia empires, including the Fatimids, in order to tell me that Shia was as prominent then as it is now. That is another fallacy from you. The Shia was a cult back then and so what a few empires leaders we're part of this cult. You know the kings and queens of Europe spoke French, was french a widely spoken language? The Assad dynasty is Alawi, are they indicative of the population of Syria?
Lol so this dude shows me the shia empires, including the Fatimids, in order to tell me that Shia was as prominent then as it is now.
That is another fallacy from you. The Shia was a cult back then and so what a few empires leaders we're part of this cult. You know the kings and queens of Europe spoke French, was french a widely spoken language? The Assad dynasty is Alawi, are they indicative of the population of Syria?
Of course not.
Since when does not being the majority sect = cult?
They were openly converting people since (at the latest) the Mongol invasion.
They already had their own jurisprudence/theology by 800/183.
How in the hell are you defining "cult?" What isn't a cult to you?
Multiple dynasties, their own prayers, their own jurisprudence, their own theology.
Yeah, okay. Not a sect.
When were they ever the majority sect pre 16th century in any nation? Link that to me and I will ask for a ban from this sub-forum forever.
LIKE I SAID, sectarian violence in Islam has been RARE, and there has never been sectarian violence on this level, this is unprecedented in Islamic history.
When were they ever the majority sect pre 16th century in any nation? Link that to me and I will ask for a ban from this sub-forum forever.
So if you get to be the majority sect in a nation-state, you're not a cult?
Jews weren't the majority in any nation until the mid 20th century from the Roman explusion.
...so during all that time, Jews were a "cult?"
What are you even arguing anymore?
Lol so this dude shows me the shia empires, including the Fatimids, in order to tell me that Shia was as prominent then as it is now. That is another fallacy from you. The Shia was a cult back then and so what a few empires leaders we're part of this cult. You know the kings and queens of Europe spoke French, was french a widely spoken language? The Assad dynasty is Alawi, are they indicative of the population of Syria?
Of course not.
I said CULT-LIKE, you fukking dolt.
Why even talk to me if you're not going to read my entire posts.