#bust
We hovering on neg train yet, brehs?
Also to note this is the first game of his career he'd been in foul trouble like that. He never had 5 fouls in any game prior (not sure if he finished with 5 fouls this game I just know he sat most of the 2nd with 3 fouls)20 pts in 21 mins (foul trouble)
Yeah Zion wasn't the problem with their early shytty play it was everybody else. They've all stepped their games up and found their grooves hence why they're winning now. This thread was retarded from the get go. Zion's ceiling is stupid crazy and even if he doesn't reach it his floor is high as fukk too.Dude is out there learning how to play the game.
Van Gundy found something with putting Zion at the high post and at the top of the key and letting him play driving lanes and using his massive frame and athleticism to attack the rim.
As I've said time and time again - his success is going to be nearly completely reliant on developing an outside shot, because his height/wingspan puts a cap on his ceiling.
I'll take your silence as you not believing the shyt you wrote - just mindless fandom bullshyt.
First of all, the camera angle and distance, and the stances they're all in don't accurately reflect their heights, and judging by the eye-line between Zion and Lonzo, there doesn't seem to be a significant margin (2+ inch difference) where this would be even worth posting. Second of all, I liked how you completely neglected to address his wingspan, considering it probably has more influence than height does; his wingspan is below-average for a 3 (let alone comparing him to big men who he'll most probably be playing against).
And no, he doesn't have the same frame as Miami LeBron; his frame is considerably smaller. The lastest measurements I can find for Zion:
Standing reach - 8'7 (whereas LeBron is/was 8'9.5)
Wingspan - 6'10 (whereas LeBron is/was 7'0.25).
This is why I said his success is going to be nearly completely reliant on developing an outside shot, because his frame isn't going to allow him to dominate against big men [and in the paint] in the league. I mean, hell, we already saw his shyt get packed in a Summer League game multiple times trying to get his shot off because of his lack of size.
How many players currently, or throughout history, have been undersized for a 3, yet dominated the league without having a jumpshot? I'll wait.
What a nonsensical reference point.
Not only is Giannis' success also reliant upon him developing an outside shot, but he stands at 6'11, with a 7ft-and-a-half wingspan (plus, the third-largest hands in NBA history), so he's less reliant on an outside shot than Zion is, because he basically towers over everyone that's on the floor. Meanwhile, Zion's out here barely standing over Lonzo.
It's going to take some sort of miracle for him to "comfortably" average those numbers.
For starters, for him to average five assists, either Lonzo and/or Jrue and/or Ingram will have to go down injured (he's NOT averaging that amount of assists if they all stay healthy), or the Pelicans have the most high-powered offense in history for all four of them to average a high-amount of assists. And if the former ends up being the result, and he averages five assists - 16 points on 52 FG% seems abnormally high that he'd be producing at a rate for a rookie on an understrength lottery team, likely playing in a position and a role that he's not comfortable in (which would affect his efficiency). And if the latter is true, then the Pelicans would likely be the #1 seed.
LeBron was nowhere near that efficient in his first season, and he was far more advanced as a scorer than Zion was at the same age.
I think it's safe to say he's not going to be comfortably averaging those numbers. Plus, nobody should be looking at his box score #s to evaluate his season/growth. Y'all nikkas need to come up off that.
Chillin wit the lil one tonight so I got time for fukkeryWho said it was crazy far fetched that he couldn't average 14-16 points? And again, I wish y'all would stop with this box score #s nonsense. If the Pelicans are force-feeding him all the time and/or he's actively cherry-picking and/or spamming easy scoring opportunities, then of course, he could average a high amount of points.
The better questions and scenarios to ponder should be about how effective he's going to be in his rookie season. Surface numbers be damned.
Oh, no doubt, but Zion's going to learn very quickly that he won't be able to charge through the lane nor grab the second-chance rebounds that supplemented the majority of his scoring production in college. He's going to have to take more jumpers, and he's going to have to take more shots that he isn't typically used to taking, against greater pressure, and bigger and better defenders.
And he certainly doesn't strike me as someone who's just going to take the easy way out on offense (à la Julius Randle).
In a vacuum, it's definitely not out of the question. But it won't happen in junction with him averaging five assists - the circumstances set up for him to average that amount won't be there for him to average those points on that efficiency. He's not going to have the possessions for starters, and it'd take some all-time great performance from the Pelicans as a unit for him to have the luxury of averaging those type of numbers (or a # of the starters get injured).
And I don't know if the Pelicans will want to heap an unnecessary workload on him in his rookie season and risk injury.
It goes without saying that if he gets chances on the break, he'll eat, but his "mass and quickness' is only going to help him so much against NBA defenders in the post. Not saying you're guilty of this, but folks shouldn't make the mistake of thinking his grown man v. kids routine is going to be a reflection for what he'll do in the league, especially when most of the time, he saw little-to-no resistance in the post in college. If he had the appropriate height and wingspan, then it'd definitely mitigate the transition, but since he doesn't, it's going to take him a lot longer to work things out.
I can't really predict his numbers since it's going to be entirely reliant on his role and minutes (nor will his #s really reflect how well he's performing). But I'm definitely not expecting some other-worldly type shyt from him, certainly not early on anyway, especially given the Pels will have to work out how space the floor - it's not like he and Favors can operate in the same spaces with Lonzo and Ingram in the lineup.
Something seemed off with him in college, but he was just so physically dominant that he was easily able to cover up those times when you'd question his offense. Folks would soon forget those down periods because they'd be engulfed with the highlight plays and commentary. I mean the 4-5 jumpshots he took in that SL game, were not only mechanically flawed, but since he doesn't have any lift on his shot, they were either getting blocked or very close to being so - struggling to get off your jumpshot over and over isn't a good sign.
Unfortunately, I think a lot of folks are going to be in for a rude awakening.
I never paid attention to how fukking great a player Stephen Adams is. He has one of the best "presences" on the court I have ever seen from a role player.
Dawg has been huge for this team, literally and figuratively