White Americans and Europeans pay this joker to reiterate this lie every couple of years.
World-renowned Egyptologist Zahi Hawass has put to bed Afrocentric claims that the Ancient Egyptians were black Africans, saying such allegations are not true at all.
Speaking to Daily News Egypt in an interview, Hawass noted that there is, however, evidence of the Kushytes who ruled Egypt during the 25th Dynasty. He noted that it is from this period that the belief of Ancient Egypt’s black African origins grew.
“If we look at Ancient Egypt, there are two theories, with one theory being that their origin was either from Semites (descendants of Shem, son of Noah) or Hamites (descendants of Ham, son of Noah), with input from Palestine and from Africa based on the faces of the people from the Delta and Upper Egypt,” he explained.
He explained that Cheikh Anta Diop is the one who really pushed the Afrocentric theory that the origin of the Ancient Egyptians was black.
“We believe that the origin of Ancient Egyptians was purely Egyptian based on the discovery made by British Egyptologist Flinders Petrie at Naqada, and this is why the Ancient Egyptian civilisation did not occur in Africa, it occurred only here,” Hawass said.
Notably, the claim that the Ancient Egyptians had black skin has become a cornerstone of Afrocentric historiography.
Mainstream scholars hold that kemet, a word frequently used for Ancient Egypt, means “the black land” or “the black place”.
It refers to the fertile black soil that was washed down from Central Africa by the annual River Nile inundation.
StackPath
Robert Bauval and Graham Hancock has been pulling his card for over a decade now. Hancock even made Hawass run out of a debate. These modern invaders in our ancestral land simply need to go, as the Bible prophesizes. At the 4:40 mark Bauval goes in on Hawass, and how he has been hiding the fact that the ancient Kemites were Black Africans, and that the civilization is much much older than what orthodox Western history wants us to believe.
What is he is saying has long been debunked, and I even laid it out in detail in the link below.
1-Basic Database of Nile Valley Studies | Egyptsearch Reloaded
Not to mention the fact that there has not been a single genetic study that links the modern invaders of "Egypt" to the people who comprised ancient Kemet. The Arab foreign invading Arabs have absolutely nothing to do with the founding of ancient Kemet, or anything to do with the Dynastic period (ended in 6th century BC) since they only came after 600 A.D
World-renowned Egyptologist Zahi Hawass has put to bed Afrocentric claims that the Ancient Egyptians were black Africans, saying such allegations are not true at all.
Speaking to Daily News Egypt in an interview, Hawass noted that there is, however, evidence of the Kushytes who ruled Egypt during the 25th Dynasty. He noted that it is from this period that the belief of Ancient Egypt’s black African origins grew.
“If we look at Ancient Egypt, there are two theories, with one theory being that their origin was either from Semites (descendants of Shem, son of Noah) or Hamites (descendants of Ham, son of Noah), with input from Palestine and from Africa based on the faces of the people from the Delta and Upper Egypt,” he explained.
He explained that Cheikh Anta Diop is the one who really pushed the Afrocentric theory that the origin of the Ancient Egyptians was black.
“We believe that the origin of Ancient Egyptians was purely Egyptian based on the discovery made by British Egyptologist Flinders Petrie at Naqada, and this is why the Ancient Egyptian civilisation did not occur in Africa, it occurred only here,” Hawass said.
Notably, the claim that the Ancient Egyptians had black skin has become a cornerstone of Afrocentric historiography.
Mainstream scholars hold that kemet, a word frequently used for Ancient Egypt, means “the black land” or “the black place”.
It refers to the fertile black soil that was washed down from Central Africa by the annual River Nile inundation.
StackPath
Robert Bauval and Graham Hancock has been pulling his card for over a decade now. Hancock even made Hawass run out of a debate. These modern invaders in our ancestral land simply need to go, as the Bible prophesizes. At the 4:40 mark Bauval goes in on Hawass, and how he has been hiding the fact that the ancient Kemites were Black Africans, and that the civilization is much much older than what orthodox Western history wants us to believe.
What is he is saying has long been debunked, and I even laid it out in detail in the link below.
https://www.thecoli.com/threads/the...iaspora-blacks-african-origins-of-civ.777687/1-Basic Database of Nile Valley Studies | Egyptsearch Reloaded
Not to mention the fact that there has not been a single genetic study that links the modern invaders of "Egypt" to the people who comprised ancient Kemet. The Arab foreign invading Arabs have absolutely nothing to do with the founding of ancient Kemet, or anything to do with the Dynastic period (ended in 6th century BC) since they only came after 600 A.D
Last edited:
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
