Youtuber explains why she only talks about Kamala and not Trump

Bryan Danielson

Jmare007 x Bryan Danielson x JLova = King Ghidorah
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
101,111
Reputation
8,971
Daps
198,317
Reppin
#We Are The Flash #DOOMSET #LukeCageSet #NEWLWO
Had to shut it off, she looks like my auntie who ruined thanksgiving a couple years back cause her white boy friend left her.

But she makes a solid point, even through Phil is a fukking c00n.


What was the point?

If you can provide cliff notes or main pointers.

Not at a position to watch.

Thank you kind sir
 

RickyDiBiase

The Sword of Jesus of Nazareth
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
14,975
Reputation
2,022
Daps
60,033
Reppin
Cbus
What was the point?

If you can provide cliff notes or main pointers.

Not at a position to watch.

Thank you kind sir

Basically the same logic as the Palestinian people= because Democrats appeal en masse to those issues it's better to criticize them than Republicans.

My thing is, and this is something regardless of where these new political media dorks land on the political aisle, is that you're going to get pushback either way so crying about it, just shows that most of them are operating like amateurs.
 

Sir Richard Spirit

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
5,182
Reputation
466
Daps
16,896
You should always criticize your pick. You should also help elevate the complaints against your pick. It’s the only way to force them into a postition that favors you.

Trump said he supports no tax on tips and Vance says $5,000 child tax credit expansion.


Now Kamala supports no tax on tips and $6,000 child tax credits.

Y’all not ready for that tho. Y’all still want rep for your posts.
 

Xyrax

Superstar
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
4,575
Reputation
2,137
Daps
26,141
Basically the same logic as the Palestinian people= because Democrats appeal en masse to those issues it's better to criticize them than Republicans.


This is weak reasoning and always has been. Your opposition is whomever you have smoke for the vast vast vast dominant majority of the time, period.

Nobody says you cant have smoke for the left; but if our literal democratic institutions are being speedran into damn near dictatorships and you have ZERO energy for the people doing it because you are far too consumed with attacking those holding the tidal wave at bay; then your ass is suspect.

Period.

I don't give a fukk. You can make room to throw criticism at both. Miss me with the excuses about why you can't. Sitting in a chair in front of a green screen with a fukking mic. You got time. :camby:
 

Kyle C. Barker

Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
27,964
Reputation
9,303
Daps
120,017
You should always criticize your pick. You should also help elevate the complaints against your pick. It’s the only way to force them into a postition that favors you.

Trump said he supports no tax on tips and Vance says $5,000 child tax credit expansion.


Now Kamala supports no tax on tips and $6,000 child tax credits.

Y’all not ready for that tho. Y’all still want rep for your posts.


Trump was the first to mention no tax on tips so I'll give him that.

With regards to JD he was a no show the last time the child tax credit was put to a vote. Overall the Republicans did what they could to block it
 

Breh13

Smh.
Supporter
Joined
Aug 5, 2015
Messages
13,145
Reputation
3,501
Daps
67,518
No if you’re espousing yourself as not left or right but only heavily attack the other side and then make up some mealy mouthed BS for not doing it to the other it just screams that’s your side.

It’s not like it’s some average republican it’s literally one of the most controversial politicians.

Own your shyt really.
 

Kyle C. Barker

Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
27,964
Reputation
9,303
Daps
120,017
She and Phillip do talk about Trump, they won't make a whole video about him but they will pepper in a little praise for him here and there. They'll say things like Trump is being attacked with lawfare (Fox News trope), or that inflation was at 0% with Trump (also not true), and even downplay project 2025.



But back to her explanation I don't really buy it. It's the equivalent to civil rights activists neglecting to protest in the South because southern cacs weren't sympathetic to their cause.
 

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
20,867
Reputation
9,942
Daps
119,051
Black people are less than 13% of the population. Of that 13% maybe 10% is eligible to vote. Of that 10% maybe 7 or 8% do if that's in line with the general trend of voting patterns in America.

How many elections have been decided solely off the black vote? Where is this narrative that black people are somehow the deciding factor on whether democrats or Republicans win? We are no more special than literally any other adult that is eligible to vote and we vote based on our interests.

A person's environment is a major factor that just seems to keep getting glossed over. A black man that grew up around Caucasians and lives in a white suburb is far more likely to vote the same as his neighbors than a black man that lives in a black neighborhood. I really dislike this assumption that we're a hivemind.

When it comes to the threat of racism, I think we CAN get on code as it were because most black people aren't naive enough to think america isn't racist. It's a threat that affects you regardless of age or status. The party that is explicitly racist is telling you you're not welcome and your other choices are a third party(like green or socialist) that is explicitly anti racist and has a reparations agenda, or the democrats who are telling you that you're welcome but don't expect to get very much stuff just for you as a group if they can't make the case that everyone in America will benefit.

How many black people have even come close to the republican nomination for president? The history speaks for itself.

Shout out to her for trying tho, get your clicks and engagement. She's not attacking electoral politics in general from an anarchist perspective, and she's not advancing a third party alternative either. She's doing what a lot of Tariq stans do and just engaging in substance less pessimism.

Again, if you're going to call out the democrats then prop UP someone better. Otherwise all you're doing is telling people to not vote. And if you're going to do that, then prop UP social movements happening RIGHT now. And if you're not going to do that either, then what the fukk are you doing other than whining at a camera all day.
 
Top