Worst takes on the internet hosted here at thecoli.com.
Lakers and Heat didn't make it back to the finals, that's true.
But the teams they lost to in the first round?
The Suns and the Bucks, respectively--who are now both in the finals, and are the best teams in their respective conferences.
What team are you even trying to big up over the Los Angeles Lakers?
What angle are you taking?
Was there a better team in the NBA last year that should have won it?
Or should the finals have been cancelled because the Lakers had it too easy compared to the other teams?
I want one of you 75-iq posters to explain to me what should have been done differently.
There's no possible way to hold the view that the title is illegitimate, if you take the time to think it through.
If they just scrubbed the entire playoffs, you'd be sitting here saying
"Whoever wins this Bucks/Suns title is illegitimate, because these are the first playoff games in two years and these guys probly don't even remember how to go hard in the paint like that, so you got fake ass Milwaukee and Phoenix here instead of teams that usually make it this far like LA or MIA."
We've all seen the receipts from you new posters.
shyt like,
"I don't even watch basketball like that. I don't see what the point of the regular season is. Why do they even do best of 7s anyways."
We know you don't watch sports.
We know it for a fact.
But yet you got this new trend where most of you have been locked inside too long, and have taken to posting about what counts/whats legit/what gets an asterisk and what not.
Saw a thread the other day, I'm not joking, had posters like
"Magic looking funny in the light when you really look at his stats, he had an easy road in the playoffs."
Cac championship had to have the nets get hurt in order to win. Championship organizations do it year in and year out. Congrats on one finals every 50 year average.
