Goldman Sachs pledges $10 billion to support advancement of Black women
Goldman Sachs pledges $10 billion to support advancement of Black women PUBLISHED WED, MAR 10 202110:26 AM ESTUPDATED WED, MAR 10 20211:30 PM EST Pippa Stevens@PIPPASTEVENS13 SHARE KEY POINTS Goldman Sachs is pledging $10 billion over 10 years to advance racial equity and economic opportunity...www.thecoli.com
Just read the responses in that thread. CACs are playing chess. It started with crack, then Uncle Sam playing step daddy and now it’s in the corporate world.
Goldman Sachs pledges $10 billion to support advancement of Black women
Goldman Sachs pledges $10 billion to support advancement of Black women PUBLISHED WED, MAR 10 202110:26 AM ESTUPDATED WED, MAR 10 20211:30 PM EST Pippa Stevens@PIPPASTEVENS13 SHARE KEY POINTS Goldman Sachs is pledging $10 billion over 10 years to advance racial equity and economic opportunity...www.thecoli.com
Just read the responses in that thread. CACs are playing chess. It started with crack, then Uncle Sam playing step daddy and now it’s in the corporate world.
I have been warning nikkas on here for years I've seen it at the highest levels.
So if a white woman hire a bunch of white women that would mean white women and white men are separated?
And if a asian woman hired a bunch of asian women that would mean asian women and asian men are separated?
Because I would think if a black woman hired a bunch of black women that means she chose a bunch of black women over white women, asian women, latina women, etc.... and those are the people who would feel offended. I didn't know men would feel offended.
So if men are offended that would mean that those black women hired other black women over white men, asian men, and latino men so all of those men should be offended too right?
Right. All of the black women that got hired probably all got black husbands including the black woman that hired them so this would be helping out the black family. I would think the people offended by this post would be other races of women like white women, asian women, and latina women. The black woman chose other black women over other races of non black women. This has nothing to do with men whatsoever.I don't have any problem fixing the sink, mowing the grass, repairing the car, and fukking the shyt out of my wife, if she's working at GS making half a mil a year.
If I'm doing my job right, she'll still be cooking, taking care of the kids after work, and doing the laundry.
Respectfully, you’re looking at it from a surface level.I don't have any problem fixing the sink, mowing the grass, repairing the car, and fukking the shyt out of my wife, if she's working at GS making half a mil a year.
If I'm doing my job right, she'll still be cooking, taking care of the kids after work, and doing the laundry.
Yup. Made a post on this. All by design.Yea at my job, the only black folk in upper upper mgt, like VPs are blk women. And you can’t tell them bytches shyt.
I know this post is going to ruffle a lot of feathers but the truth always does.
This is the hierarchy of who corporate America prefers hiring in terms of preference of “blacks”:
1. Black female LGBT (bonus points if they’re mixed race.) These are the ones who identify by their sexuality before their color. They won’t rock the boat. They see themselves as colorless. Hiring kills three birds with one stone. They look great for their diversity portfolio on their website.
2. West Indian/African - 1st generation or fresh off the boat. Again, they love hiring people from this group because they won’t challenge their anti-black American views. I’ve “heard” many even join in with these comments.
From my experience, they see Nigerians as the most docile and grateful for getting a pat on the head, so they don’t have to worry about them putting other black folk on.
3. Mammy/God fearing. Now they usually have these types in middle management. Rarely in the boardrooms if they don’t fit the “aesthetic” of the company. But they use these types to watch over the plantation and keep any rebel negro check.
White women love them especially because they know they’re not a threat sexually and they’re there for their entertainment.
4. Gay black men. They don’t want to hire or promote any black men period but if they have to, then gay black men are no different from no.1. Actually, I’ll be honest, I’ve some who were pro-black in silence but they definitely “twirled”‘it up in front of the CACs to seem less threatening. But for the most part, they’re not seen as a threat.
5. Straight black women. If she doesn’t have a zaddy or a fake valley girl accent, it’s hard for a conscious black woman to get hired. But, they’re preferable over straight black men in management positions… maybe not so much the board rooms.
6. Straight black man (who aren’t c00ns). If you’re not skinning and grinning or PAWGing… you are bottom of the totem pole in the corporate world. It will be damn near impossible for you to move up unless the higher ups really like you. It doesn’t matter how great you are at your job.
You have to be Damn near irreplaceable to make the same money as the incompetent CACs they’ll put ahead of you.
I’m semi-self employed… the only reason I’m still part time at job is because I can work at home… I hustled the fukk out of those white folk just before the pandemic, and if I was made redundant, my severance pay would’ve been ridiculous. I’ll stay on until they get rid of me. At least I don’t have to see them in the office.
If you’re a Straight non-c00nish black man… learn all you can in the corporate world and start your own with like minded folks. These CACs do NOT want you ahead of them or on their level. The aforementioned are happy with their token role but you shouldn’t be.
Yea at my job, the only black folk in upper upper mgt, like VPs are blk women. And you can’t tell them bytches shyt.
On god. Corporate black women think they’re a different race.
There are no black men hiring a bunch of black men, and there is no other group who will. You are being wilfully obtuse.