You rather be: 40 Years Old, Fat, Short & Ugly making 500k a yr OR 40 Years Old, Tall, Slim, Handsome making 100k a yr?

[Windows 91]

Need an extra 0 for anyone to consider option 1

 

[Shadow King]

Ya you wylin

If you go out and be in the city you def know who got money and who don’t. 500K is noticeable as fukk. Broke nikkas might say you trickin though

No, I'm not wilding.

Other than making sure hoes see you step out of a Bentley instead of a 7/S-Class there's no real difference. Your wardrobe will be the largely the same level.

 

[OneManGang]

No, I'm not wilding.

Other than making sure hoes see you step out of a Bentley instead of a 7/S-Class there's no real difference. Your wardrobe will be the largely the same level.

I make 100k. I can assure you 500K is some different shyt. Ya we just not gonna agree on this. Plus you say the Bentley like it’s not a huge deal That’s super car money. Pull up to a spot in a Ferrari type shyt

 

[buzzkill]

Give me 500k a year idgaf how I look I'd hire a trainer and get sugar babies if I'm that ugly fukk it

 

[Shadow King]

I make 100k. I can assure you 500K is some different shyt. Ya we just not gonna agree on this. Plus you say the Bentley like it’s not a huge deal

So do I, and I've spoken on having a blue collar appearance contrary to the common "look" of a six figure person which challenges this "mmmm money equals hoes" narrative. But, I said less than half, which is not capped at 100K.

A person making say, 200K, is not out of the reach of dressing in the same wardrobe as someone making 500K, unless A) 200K person chooses to not give a fukk about fashion (I'll be close into this in about 6 years) or B) the 500K person makes a point to spend no less than 4 figures on every article of clothing, which is squandering his money in the first place.

I said make sure hoes see you step out the Bentley instead of the 7/S Class, for it's the only purchase big enough to be seen in public to separate someone making 500K from someone making 200K.

 

[OneManGang]

So do I, and I've spoken on having a blue collar appearance contrary to the common "look" of a six figure person which challenges this "mmmm money equals hoes" narrative. But, I said less than half, which is not capped at 100K.

A person making say, 200K, is not out of the reach of dressing in the same wardrobe as someone making 500K, unless A) 200K person chooses to not give a fukk about fashion (I'll be close into this in about 6 years) or B) the 500K person makes a point to spend no less than 4 figures on every article of clothing, which is squandering his money in the first place.

I said make sure hoes see you step out the Bentley instead of the 7/S Class, for it's the only purchase big enough to be seen in public to separate someone making 500K from someone making 200K.

Man I don’t care about none of that. 500k, I could look like the penguin, I’m cleaning up

 

[feelosofer]

I'll take 1st option. 500k a year even after taxes allows me to live comfortable and invest aggressively.

 

[Shadow King]

Man I don’t care about none of that. 500k, I could look like the penguin, I’m cleaning up

No.

 

[banner34]

500k

 

[FreshFromATL]

Lol at being fat, ugly, and short. I care about my health and I'd never want to be a short nikka

 

[Dance_Like_A_Fiend]

How short?

 

[Uncle Trill]

Could have made it a harder and better question op.

Making 40K would have given us more food for thought.

 

[8WON6]

an ugly dude making 500k a year will just be a mark for accusations.

 

[3rdWorld]

I'm already the 2nd breh..

 

[SNG]

Definitely the 100,000 and the being in the best physical shape. I would get more attention physically and wouldn’t have to let my money talk for me.