and liberalism is sneakily anti black
liberalism is anti-black progress, without black dysfunctionality they can't exist.
and liberalism is sneakily anti black
No one has said liberals aren't racist.
The point is that increasing subjugation under a far-right federal court is bad idea. Its literally a shot in the foot.
The federal courts have been, for the last century, the only area of relief from explicitly racist state courts.
A loss of them is a permanent class.
Conservatism is explicitly anti-Black.
liberalism is anti-black progress, without black dysfunctionality they can't exist.
so we agree thenliberalism is anti-black progress, without black dysfunctionality they can't exist.
so we agree then
Partially; they're very pro-black when we're docile and weak, and they love their foot groveling dog bowl licking c00ns who do their bidding like @dj-method-x and @LeVraiPapi
Neg.If your vote for Demoncrats you are a voting for FUK BOIS literally
No, its not.and liberalism is sneakily anti black
I can believe that. The stupid in here is pretty potent.I posted a much more detailed version of this in a different thread and got negged.
oh no? then why do the liberals that run shyt still have black people living in ghettos and projects or move them out of their homes the second their property values riseNo, its not.
There are anti-Black liberals.
Liberalism is a political philosophy.
conspiratorial bullshytliberalism is anti-black progress, without black dysfunctionality they can't exist.
that fact that the most typing-est nikka on this entire forum and possibly the history of forums, only has a 2 word response lets me know it's true.conspiratorial bullshyt
i don't think that civil rights, secular societies, and open mindedness is "black dysfunction"that fact that the most typing-est nikka on this entire forum and possibly the history of forums, only has a 2 word response lets me know it's true.