and liberalism is sneakily anti black
liberalism is anti-black progress, without black dysfunctionality they can't exist.
and liberalism is sneakily anti black
No one has said liberals aren't racist.
The point is that increasing subjugation under a far-right federal court is bad idea. Its literally a shot in the foot.
The federal courts have been, for the last century, the only area of relief from explicitly racist state courts.
A loss of them is a permanent class.
Conservatism is explicitly anti-Black.
liberalism is anti-black progress, without black dysfunctionality they can't exist.
so we agree thenliberalism is anti-black progress, without black dysfunctionality they can't exist.
so we agree then![]()
Partially; they're very pro-black when we're docile and weak, and they love their foot groveling dog bowl licking c00ns who do their bidding like @dj-method-x and @LeVraiPapi
Neg.If your vote for Demoncrats you are a voting for FUK BOISliterally
![]()
No, its not.and liberalism is sneakily anti black
I can believe that. The stupid in here is pretty potent.I posted a much more detailed version of this in a different thread and got negged.
oh no? then why do the liberals that run shyt still have black people living in ghettos and projectsNo, its not.
There are anti-Black liberals.
Liberalism is a political philosophy.
conspiratorial bullshytliberalism is anti-black progress, without black dysfunctionality they can't exist.
conspiratorial bullshyt
i don't think that civil rights, secular societies, and open mindedness is "black dysfunction"that fact that the most typing-est nikka on this entire forum and possibly the history of forums, only has a 2 word response lets me know it's true.