Nephilim_BC
Murikkka
Weak rebuttals
You guys still sleeping on Memphis Grizzlies? :what:
- Thread starter Methodical
- Start date
Padron1926
Pro
ur a fukkin retard
Thank you for conceding that you have no valid, logical argument to defend your opinion.
3 man ran team cant win a ring
Nephilim_BC
Murikkka
You try to hard to sound smart. Doesnt work well with coli emojis
Padron1926
Pro
Thank you for conceding that you have no valid, logical argument to defend your argument.
U have no argument ur talking in circles......tell me again that fg % doesnt matter....retard
Nephilim_BC
Murikkka
Spurs? Heat? I hope i misread your post
Dumba**, you initially argued that Z-Bo CANNOT score consistently enough. You based your argument solely on his performance in the 2013 Spurs playoffs series.
I pointed out that he had other playoff series where he was monumental on offense.
You then argued that he had a horrible FG%.
I argued that his FG% is irrelevant as to whether he can CONSISTENTLY SCORE for his team.
I argue that FG% is irrelevant because you can still consistently lead your team by scoring, regardless of your FG%. FG% solely measures a player's offensive efficiency. Not being an efficient scorer =/= a player can't lead his team by scoring consistently. However, this is all lost on you.
What seasons are you referring to here?
Padron1926
Pro
Dumba**, you initially argued that Z-Bo CANNOT score consistently enough. You based your argument solely on his performance in the 2013 Spurs playoffs series.
I pointed out that he had other playoff series where he was monumental on offense.
You then argued that he had a horrible FG%.
I argued that his FG% is irrelevant as to whether he can CONSISTENTLY SCORE for his team.
I argue that FG% is irrelevant because you can still consistently lead your team by scoring, regardless of your FG%. FG% solely measures a player's offensive efficiency. Not being an efficient scorer =/= a player can't lead his team by scoring consistently. However, this is all lost on you.
Yea miss shot during crunch time thats how to win games......wasnt exactly consistent during last years playoffs either.....face it without a scoring 2 or 3, they aint winning shyt this year
1. FG% has NOTHING to do with that.
2. That was only 1 series. Are you going to ignore the other series he had against the Spurs in 2010? Or the playoffs series against the Thunder in 2010? Or last season's series against the Thunder? Or all of his series against the Clippers?
Cherry pick the sole exception to argue against the rule, brehs...
3. While help is always good, the Grizzlies don't NEED a 2 or a 3 to be a contender/to win.
4. You're the guy who's arguing in circles and then accusing others of doing so. Lame.
Padron1926
Pro
1. FG% has NOTHING to do with that.
2. That was only 1 series. Are you going to ignore the other series he had against the Spurs in 2010? Or the playoffs series against the Thunder in 2010? Or last season's series against the Thunder? Or all of his series against the Clippers?
Cherry pick the sole exception to argue against the rule, brehs...
3. While help is always good, the Grizzlies don't NEED a 2 or a 3.
That was the biggest series they have had in the last 2 years......without a scoring 2 or 3 they aint winning shyt this year just like they havent won shyt in the past...they didnt even make it out of the first round last year.......im not saying zach is a problem with the team but they are lacking
2010,11,12,14
Again, it was just one series. Still, Z-Bo has proven over the last 4 years (in multiple playoffs series) that he can lead the team by scoring consistently.
And I believe they don't need a 2 or 3 to contend. But let's agree to disagree.