"Do you think a wrestler was good because he had good matches". Yes. Warrior was good because he had good matches. Lol at leaving out the match with Hogan.
The real question you should be asking is: Is a wrestler really good if he has bad matches with good wrestlers? In the case of HBK's title run, I'd argue it was was worse than Diesel's or Warrior's, because he was having bad matches with good wrestlers, whereas Nash and Warrior could elevate themselves when working with someone good.
The real question you should be asking is: Is a wrestler really good if he has bad matches with good wrestlers? In the case of HBK's title run, I'd argue it was was worse than Diesel's or Warrior's, because he was having bad matches with good wrestlers, whereas Nash and Warrior could elevate themselves when working with someone good.
Last edited: