Yea so Georgia opening back up was a good idea huh?

[Wild self]

There's an extremely heavy price to pay for living in Red states..

Yeah, with brain dead governors.

Dont let the cheaper cost of living, broke sex workers that look good, and car culture fool you.....its a Catch 22 that you will pay for your life.

 

[TripleAgent]

Kenya only got 345 Confirmed cases. 14 deaths. And we out about every day but with masks. The places where the cases popped up. Which is mostly Nairobi aren't allowed to travel out of the city.

Current city I'm in as this blows over has zero cases. Zero deaths.


I'm waiting for this dumb shyt to be over and to see the shyt we'll be forced to do next. Forced vaccinations for one.

I'm thinking it's the climate. Especially if humidity is low. Virus probably can't make it across the air. Less cacs and Chinese is probably good, too.

 

[UberEatsDriver]

I'm thinking it's the climate. Especially if humidity is low. Virus probably can't make it across the air. Less cacs and Chinese is probably good, too.

There was clearly an article posted on this site that showed the virus can speak through all of that.

we won’t know anything unless everyone is tested

 

[Cadillac]

stay safe georgia brehs

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Kenya only got 345 Confirmed cases. 14 deaths. And we out about every day but with masks. The places where the cases popped up. Which is mostly Nairobi aren't allowed to travel out of the city.

Current city I'm in as this blows over has zero cases. Zero deaths.


I'm waiting for this dumb shyt to be over and to see the shyt we'll be forced to do next. Forced vaccinations for one.

You do realize that Kenya being near the equator and having a different climate means it spreads completely differently there, right?

You really think that EVERY health care professional and hospital from Wuhan to Italy to New York is just making up some shyt?

 

[Professor Emeritus]

There was clearly an article posted on this site that showed the virus can speak through all of that.

we won’t know anything unless everyone is tested

There's a huge difference between "can" and "does". The ideal temperature for spread is 50 degrees and they've shown that heat and light degrade the virus rather quickly. Sure, some % of the virus "can" survive heat and light, but the more heat and light you subject it to the more it's constantly degrading and becoming less efficient in its spread. You don't have to completely kill it, only make the spread potential less likely, so that the average person who catches it infects 1 or fewer other people. Then it keeps petering out on its own.

By this point it can't be a coincidence that China, Iran, Italy, Spain, France, UK, Belgium, Netherlands, Sweden, New York, Washington, Massachusetts, Michigan, etc. The warm-weather countries just aren't getting hit like that.

 

[Piff Perkins]

You do realize that Kenya being near the equator and having a different climate means it spreads completely differently there, right?

You really think that EVERY health care professional and hospital from Wuhan to Italy to New York is just making up some shyt?

To be fair it's spreading a second time in the Philippines which is hot as fukk right now. Weather isn't killing it.

 

[DJ Paul's Arm]

To be fair it's spreading a second time in the Philippines which is hot as fukk right now. Weather isn't killing it.

You out there?

 

[UberEatsDriver]

There's a huge difference between "can" and "does". The ideal temperature for spread is 50 degrees and they've shown that heat and light degrade the virus rather quickly. Sure, some % of the virus "can" survive heat and light, but the more heat and light you subject it to the more it's constantly degrading and becoming less efficient in its spread. You don't have to completely kill it, only make the spread potential less likely, so that the average person who catches it infects 1 or fewer other people. Then it keeps petering out on its own.

By this point it can't be a coincidence that China, Iran, Italy, Spain, France, UK, Belgium, Netherlands, Sweden, New York, Washington, Massachusetts, Michigan, etc. The warm-weather countries just aren't getting hit like that.

wrong. Brazil and Ecuador got hit hard and so did Miami and New Orleans

 

[Creflo ½ Dollar]

Mass testing

There will always be a second peak or wave..,probably not big as the first but it’s going to be bigger than the lockdown numbers..

 

[TooLazyToMakeUp1]

Any business owner willing to put their business in the line of fire doesn't need to be in business

l

 

[Professor Emeritus]

To be fair it's spreading a second time in the Philippines which is hot as fukk right now. Weather isn't killing it.

Think about it - why you saying "a second time" in the Philippines if the first wave is still raging in America? How'd it die out so quickly there in the first wave, with so few casualties, when they're packed into those slums like sardines?

Philippines was one of the earliest countries exposed, they have one of the densest populations in the world, a solid 2/3 of the capital city lives in a slum, the average person's health isn't great (diabetes is rampant). They should be putting up MASSIVE death tolls, by demographics you would think Manila alone would have 10x the NYC death tolls. Yet the entire country still has just 494 deaths out of over 100 million people despite all those disadvantages. That's less than 5 deaths per million people.

Belgium/Spain/Italy have 400-600 deaths per million residents.
Sweden/France/Netherlands/UK have 200-400 deaths per milllion.
USA has 164 deaths/million even with the spread only bad in part of the country (NY has over 1000 deaths/million).
Philippines has 5 deaths per million residents. Just 5.

I didn't say that climate completely wipes out the disease. But with all its MASSIVE disadvantages, how the hell would the Philippines be getting off 100x more lightly than those further north nations if it isn't the weather? Philippines should be much WORSE than Europe, not lighter, just like it's worse for TB and all sorts of other diseases. And this ain't nothing special to the Philippines - Thailand, India, Nigeria, they all should have been going off by now. Even if you say they're missing most cases, there's no way they could hide it if they were putting up Italy/NYC numbers, and they're simply not.

wrong. Brazil and Ecuador got hit hard

Ecuador where the populated spots are ain't hot at all man, people there live in the mountains, the capital is damn near twice as high as Denver. Today the capital city (Quito) has a low of 47 and a high of 69, with thunderstorms. That's been the same weather all through March/April. Do you think it's a coincidence that the one country in that part of the world that actually has cool weather (due to its elevation) is also the exact country that got hit hardest? Ecuador is literally the one place in the tropics where the deaths look like Europe/North America,

Brazil has a much milder March than most of the countries we're talking about - highs in the 70s and low 80s and lows in the 60s. They were warm but they wen't getting tropical weather yet. And yet their death toll is still only 19 deaths per million people. Unless they're hiding 90% of their deaths, they're not putting up Europe/America-style numbers.

Remember, every single one of these tropical countries should be getting hit much WORSE than the West, not way lighter. You're having to cherry-pick 1-2 out of a hundred countries with warm weather and they still ain't close to the situation that all those further north countries are facing despite FAR more resources and a concentrated effort to stop it.

The trend gotta be clear by now. If the USA has 50,000 deaths, then India should have 5,000,000 deaths. People are packed in like crazy, and while they ain't going out in the streets back in the slums and shyt they ain't social isolating at all, even right now the average Indian must contact 100+ people a day with no social distancing whatsoever. Not to mention that their health and health care is WOAT. How are they avoiding devastation if not for their weather?

so did Miami and New Orleans

The difference between Western nations and the spots I was talking about is that most people in the west live and work in climate control. They be spreading that shyt indoors where they keep the thermostat at 68-72, while people in most of the rest of the world actually experience their climate. Saying that warm and sun slow the spread of the virus don't mean shyt if you ain't out in the warmth and sun.

That being said, these are the USA states getting hit worst in terms of deaths per million:

New York - 1,117
New Jersey - 660
Connecticut - 520
Massachusetts - 400
Louisiana - 365
Michigan - 329
Rhode Island - 203
Illinois - 146
Maryland - 146
Pennsylvania - 141

If it weren't for weather, there should only be three big factors affecting those numbers: Population density, population health, and how well local officials are handling the crisis. We all know that the average health is the worst in the South and that those Southern governors ain't handling this thing for shyt. So why is it that Louisiana (which probably had its huge spike due to Mardi Gras shyt) is the only southern state in the top-10? Some southern states have rural populations so they wouldn't get hit as bad, but Miami, Orlando, Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, Austin, Tampa, Charlotte - they all should be getting hit bad bad. So why do none of them look like NYC or Jersey or Boston? You got to go to #15 before you get another Southern state, and like I said, that's EVEN with climate control having an impact.

 

[FukkaPaidEmail]

Think about it - why you saying "a second time" in the Philippines if the first wave is still raging in America? How'd it die out so quickly there in the first wave, with so few casualties, when they're packed into those slums like sardines?

Philippines was one of the earliest countries exposed, they have one of the densest populations in the world, a solid 2/3 of the capital city lives in a slum, the average person's health isn't great (diabetes is rampant). They should be putting up MASSIVE death tolls, by demographics you would think Manila alone would have 10x the NYC death tolls. Yet the entire country still has just 494 deaths out of over 100 million people despite all those disadvantages. That's less than 5 deaths per million people.

Belgium/Spain/Italy have 400-600 deaths per million residents.
Sweden/France/Netherlands/UK have 200-400 deaths per milllion.
USA has 164 deaths/million even with the spread only bad in part of the country (NY has over 1000 deaths/million).
Philippines has 5 deaths per million residents. Just 5.

I didn't say that climate completely wipes out the disease. But with all its MASSIVE disadvantages, how the hell would the Philippines be getting off 100x more lightly than those further north nations if it isn't the weather? Philippines should be much WORSE than Europe, not lighter, just like it's worse for TB and all sorts of other diseases. And this ain't nothing special to the Philippines - Thailand, India, Nigeria, they all should have been going off by now. Even if you say they're missing most cases, there's no way they could hide it if they were putting up Italy/NYC numbers, and they're simply not.




Ecuador where the populated spots are ain't hot at all man, people there live in the mountains, the capital is damn near twice as high as Denver. Today the capital city (Quito) has a low of 47 and a high of 69, with thunderstorms. That's been the same weather all through March/April. Do you think it's a coincidence that the one country in that part of the world that actually has cool weather (due to its elevation) is also the exact country that got hit hardest? Ecuador is literally the one place in the tropics where the deaths look like Europe/North America,

Brazil has a much milder March than most of the countries we're talking about - highs in the 70s and low 80s and lows in the 60s. They were warm but they wen't getting tropical weather yet. And yet their death toll is still only 19 deaths per million people. Unless they're hiding 90% of their deaths, they're not putting up Europe/America-style numbers.

Remember, every single one of these tropical countries should be getting hit much WORSE than the West, not way lighter. You're having to cherry-pick 1-2 out of a hundred countries with warm weather and they still ain't close to the situation that all those further north countries are facing despite FAR more resources and a concentrated effort to stop it.

The trend gotta be clear by now. If the USA has 50,000 deaths, then India should have 5,000,000 deaths. People are packed in like crazy, and while they ain't going out in the streets back in the slums and shyt they ain't social isolating at all, even right now the average Indian must contact 100+ people a day with no social distancing whatsoever. Not to mention that their health and health care is WOAT. How are they avoiding devastation if not for their weather?




The difference between Western nations and the spots I was talking about is that most people in the west live and work in climate control. They be spreading that shyt indoors where they keep the thermostat at 68-72, while people in most of the rest of the world actually experience their climate. Saying that warm and sun slow the spread of the virus don't mean shyt if you ain't out in the warmth and sun.

That being said, these are the USA states getting hit worst in terms of deaths per million:

New York - 1,117
New Jersey - 660
Connecticut - 520
Massachusetts - 400
Louisiana - 365
Michigan - 329
Rhode Island - 203
Illinois - 146
Maryland - 146
Pennsylvania - 141

If it weren't for weather, there should only be three big factors affecting those numbers: Population density, population health, and how well local officials are handling the crisis. We all know that the average health is the worst in the South and that those Southern governors ain't handling this thing for shyt. So why is it that Louisiana (which probably had its huge spike due to Mardi Gras shyt) is the only southern state in the top-10? Some southern states have rural populations so they wouldn't get hit as bad, but Miami, Orlando, Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, Austin, Tampa, Charlotte - they all should be getting hit bad bad. So why do none of them look like NYC or Jersey or Boston? You got to go to #15 before you get another Southern state, and like I said, that's EVEN with climate control having an impact.

Powerful posting

 

[FukkaPaidEmail]

If we’re keeping it a buck the day a state like Michigan,New York or Jersey has 600 new cases and 20 deaths statewide our governments will be running to get open too

Difference is we’ve hit our peaks ,is that Georgia’s case too ?


If so

 

[Kaydigi]

Kemp s

Think about it - why you saying "a second time" in the Philippines if the first wave is still raging in America? How'd it die out so quickly there in the first wave, with so few casualties, when they're packed into those slums like sardines?

Philippines was one of the earliest countries exposed, they have one of the densest populations in the world, a solid 2/3 of the capital city lives in a slum, the average person's health isn't great (diabetes is rampant). They should be putting up MASSIVE death tolls, by demographics you would think Manila alone would have 10x the NYC death tolls. Yet the entire country still has just 494 deaths out of over 100 million people despite all those disadvantages. That's less than 5 deaths per million people.

Belgium/Spain/Italy have 400-600 deaths per million residents.
Sweden/France/Netherlands/UK have 200-400 deaths per milllion.
USA has 164 deaths/million even with the spread only bad in part of the country (NY has over 1000 deaths/million).
Philippines has 5 deaths per million residents. Just 5.

I didn't say that climate completely wipes out the disease. But with all its MASSIVE disadvantages, how the hell would the Philippines be getting off 100x more lightly than those further north nations if it isn't the weather? Philippines should be much WORSE than Europe, not lighter, just like it's worse for TB and all sorts of other diseases. And this ain't nothing special to the Philippines - Thailand, India, Nigeria, they all should have been going off by now. Even if you say they're missing most cases, there's no way they could hide it if they were putting up Italy/NYC numbers, and they're simply not.




Ecuador where the populated spots are ain't hot at all man, people there live in the mountains, the capital is damn near twice as high as Denver. Today the capital city (Quito) has a low of 47 and a high of 69, with thunderstorms. That's been the same weather all through March/April. Do you think it's a coincidence that the one country in that part of the world that actually has cool weather (due to its elevation) is also the exact country that got hit hardest? Ecuador is literally the one place in the tropics where the deaths look like Europe/North America,

Brazil has a much milder March than most of the countries we're talking about - highs in the 70s and low 80s and lows in the 60s. They were warm but they wen't getting tropical weather yet. And yet their death toll is still only 19 deaths per million people. Unless they're hiding 90% of their deaths, they're not putting up Europe/America-style numbers.

Remember, every single one of these tropical countries should be getting hit much WORSE than the West, not way lighter. You're having to cherry-pick 1-2 out of a hundred countries with warm weather and they still ain't close to the situation that all those further north countries are facing despite FAR more resources and a concentrated effort to stop it.

The trend gotta be clear by now. If the USA has 50,000 deaths, then India should have 5,000,000 deaths. People are packed in like crazy, and while they ain't going out in the streets back in the slums and shyt they ain't social isolating at all, even right now the average Indian must contact 100+ people a day with no social distancing whatsoever. Not to mention that their health and health care is WOAT. How are they avoiding devastation if not for their weather?




The difference between Western nations and the spots I was talking about is that most people in the west live and work in climate control. They be spreading that shyt indoors where they keep the thermostat at 68-72, while people in most of the rest of the world actually experience their climate. Saying that warm and sun slow the spread of the virus don't mean shyt if you ain't out in the warmth and sun.

That being said, these are the USA states getting hit worst in terms of deaths per million:

New York - 1,117
New Jersey - 660
Connecticut - 520
Massachusetts - 400
Louisiana - 365
Michigan - 329
Rhode Island - 203
Illinois - 146
Maryland - 146
Pennsylvania - 141

If it weren't for weather, there should only be three big factors affecting those numbers: Population density, population health, and how well local officials are handling the crisis. We all know that the average health is the worst in the South and that those Southern governors ain't handling this thing for shyt. So why is it that Louisiana (which probably had its huge spike due to Mardi Gras shyt) is the only southern state in the top-10? Some southern states have rural populations so they wouldn't get hit as bad, but Miami, Orlando, Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, Austin, Tampa, Charlotte - they all should be getting hit bad bad. So why do none of them look like NYC or Jersey or Boston? You got to go to #15 before you get another Southern state, and like I said, that's EVEN with climate control having an impact.

I read that in the architects voice