So wait who do we compare WWE to if we can't compare their deal to real sports? They're using WWE to replace a real sport in UFC and no TV show would dare put on 5 hours of primetime content on every week week because that would burn out the writers.
You aren't getting the point breh.
I mean no disrespect.
You are arguing "they don't get the ratings that are compared to (insert other show/era)"
If this is correct.
What I am saying is that... "whatever metric YOU think is appropriate for ratings, does not matter"
there is no debate on this. I'm not going back and forth with you on "comparing ratings" with real sports. I'm not arguing that they get higher ratings, what I am saying is that CLEARLY ratings (whatever they are...high medium or low) aren't going to make them alter the product to suit what you feel you want.
Unless you are a high ranking executive with either the WWE, or Fox or NBCU...your opinion on the ratings does not matter. I'm not here to argue, but I genuinely don't get why this is a hard concept to get.
Their ratings are fine for what they want.