WOW so Watchdogs Legion’s a big stinker, huh? (Bad reviews)

Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,271
Daps
60,675
Reppin
NULL
the first was the only good one and that's the PC version because the gunplay at high frame rates is pretty good plus the driving is much better at higher frames

Watch Dogs 2 is so poorly optimized on PC, its just frustrating to play, but the missions are wack less action oriented, etc

this legion looked like ass from the beginning

This is the problem when you listen to fans cry, the first watch dogs was unfairly hated on because it was a downgrade from the E3 trailer, so it never got a fair shake from the jump, instead of improving upon the good things in the game and polishing it up, they changed the direction of the game, people say watch dogs 2 is better only because the gaming media said it was out the gate, but the game is real boring, I still haven't beat it simply because I get bored everytime I try to go back to it , even when I tested on the 3080 I couldn't play it for more than 20 minutes
 

Leasy

Let's add some Alizarin Crimson & Van Dyke Brown
Supporter
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
46,152
Reputation
4,680
Daps
102,095
Reppin
Philly (BYRD GANG)
Watch Dogs 2 was crack and the living world was among the best in open world games. I believe that Ubisoft doesn’t believe their own products. Watch Dogs 1 was generic as fukk and boring. Watch Dogs 2 was unique bright and different. I don’t know why they didn’t build from 2. The graphics looks terrible for 3
 

Rain

👀
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
32,766
Reputation
5,479
Daps
103,853
This is the problem with reviews and perception of scores in general. A 77 is an "ok" game. Not amazing. Not bad. It has 17 positive reviews and 10 mixed with 0 negative. Not everything needs to be a 90+ to be a decent game.

The problem is most people aren't itching to pay $60+ for an "ok" game so Ubi really needed this to be a bigger critic success
 

Gizmo_Duck

blathering blatherskite!
Joined
Aug 15, 2018
Messages
81,959
Reputation
6,737
Daps
175,614
Reppin
Duckburg, NY
This is the problem with reviews and perception of scores in general. A 77 is an "ok" game. Not amazing. Not bad. It has 17 positive reviews and 10 mixed with 0 negative. Not everything needs to be a 90+ to be a decent game.

The problem is most people aren't itching to pay $60+ for an "ok" game so Ubi really needed this to be a bigger critic success

I feel like even the UBI games that score well (80+) are kind of mediocre so when the industry is like "this is below the typical ubisoft game standards" I gotta take that to mean it's trash.

the first was the only good one and that's the PC version because the gunplay at high frame rates is pretty good plus the driving is much better at higher frames

Watch Dogs 2 is so poorly optimized on PC, its just frustrating to play, but the missions are wack less action oriented, etc

this legion looked like ass from the beginning

This is the problem when you listen to fans cry, the first watch dogs was unfairly hated on because it was a downgrade from the E3 trailer, so it never got a fair shake from the jump, instead of improving upon the good things in the game and polishing it up, they changed the direction of the game, people say watch dogs 2 is better only because the gaming media said it was out the gate, but the game is real boring, I still haven't beat it simply because I get bored everytime I try to go back to it , even when I tested on the 3080 I couldn't play it for more than 20 minutes

I actually agree with you here. The one thing you can't listen to is the internet and their gut reactions to things. The number one rule of making a product is that the audience doesn't know what they want you have to show them. You allow user feedback to change your mind and you will never make a good product.
 

Maximus Rex

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2015
Messages
8,011
Reputation
-3,481
Daps
18,666
Reppin
The Evils of Men
Watch Dogs :banderas:

Watch Dogs 2 :beli:

Watch Dogs Legion looked like trash because of the constant switching characters and keeping the narrative and tone of Watch Dogs 2
 

Hey_zeus

Veteran
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
53,773
Reputation
5,367
Daps
165,059
Reppin
Chicago
Shame how WD started this gen as the first next gen showcase(pre downgrade) and finished up here. Mismanagement of the IP
 

Luke Cage

Coffee Lover
Supporter
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
52,953
Reputation
19,638
Daps
271,555
Reppin
Harlem
Watch Dogs 2 was crack and the living world was among the best in open world games. I believe that Ubisoft doesn’t believe their own products. Watch Dogs 1 was generic as fukk and boring. Watch Dogs 2 was unique bright and different. I don’t know why they didn’t build from 2. The graphics looks terrible for 3
Yeah, i agree. I really enjoyed Watchdogs 2 and was hoping for a continuation of that. instead they went fully online and abandon a straight narrative. plus the graphics look like they haven't improved at all.
 

bigdaddy88

The King Of Power
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
15,791
Reputation
3,848
Daps
67,541
Shame how WD started this gen as the first next gen showcase(pre downgrade) and finished up here. Mismanagement of the IP

and they butchered the assassins creed series, unrecognizable at this point, i appreciate going back and egypt but:francis: but they seem to fail upwards some how
 
Top