my whole issue with this whole line of questioning is the warriors could of got K love and said "no" they "wanted to keep klay". Then when Klay wants to get paid like he is a player worth not trading for K love for the warriors say "no" as well?
shyt doesn't make sense. I know they lucked into Curry taking so little but Curry was injury prone a lot at that point so it made sense for him to go after a longer deal regardless for security reasons. Klay has no reason to agree to less than the max, and will get it on the open market.