Worst thing in history. What do you think is?

mrken12

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
80,804
Reputation
20,880
Daps
300,341
Reppin
Maryland
White people. :scheme:

i think the US is one of the worst things to happen to the world

not only have we caused unspeakle travgedy around the world, but our infrastructure is increasinyly disgusting. this county i sa disgusting, murderous sloth

wouldnt live anywehere else tho :ahh:

:usure: I would.
 

#BOTHSIDES

Superstar
Joined
Aug 5, 2013
Messages
5,799
Reputation
1,610
Daps
13,628
Reppin
The Chi
Without going into extensive detail, slavery throughout the world has always existed in some way or form.The trans-saharan slave trade was nowhere near as brutal as the transatlantic. Many slaves of the trans-saharan slave trade ranged from violent offenders(rapist) to captured warriors from other tribes. The slaves were still treated with some sort of dignity and were able to be reintegrated back into society, as productive member after a few years(5-10). Whereas in the trans atlantic, slaves were seen as less than human....
They would often castrate the African males cuz they thought they were highly sexual beastsm
 

Sensitive Blake Griffin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,124
Reputation
2,638
Daps
67,702
I think it's always important to note that there is a sort of "creation through destruction" that occurs in history. While the mongols did some fukked up things, they also made trade routes safe to travel and other stuff that caused growth.
 

Serious

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
80,162
Reputation
14,319
Daps
190,905
Reppin
1st Round Playoff Exits
I guess where you lost me was how you worded it "the trans-saharian slave trade wasn't necessarily a bad thing" I assume what you mean now is it wasn't AS BAD as the transatlantic slave trade. Which I guess is possible, however I don't know where you get you facts from (not saying there wrong) but it sounds kind of like someone retelling history to make it sound better than what it was. In general I believe most people who owned slaves treated them likes property. Were their cases where it wasn't as bad sure but the majority of the time I doubt it was much different from Rome, Middle East, America, or wherever.

My .02
I'll let you be the judge here's a passage from my African American studies book:


Class and Slavery
Although many West Africans lived in stateless societies, most lived in hierarchially organized states headed by monarchs who claimed divine or semidivine status. These monarchs were far more absolute in the power they wielded, but they commanded armies, taxed commerce, and accumulated considerable wealth. Beneath the royalty were classes of landed nobles, warriors, peasants, and bureaucrats. Lower classes included blacksmiths, butchers, weavers, woodcarvers, tanners, and the oral historians called griots.

Slavery had been part of this hierarchiacal social structure since ancient times. Although very common throughout West Africa, slavery was less so in the forest region than on the savannah. It took a wide variety of forms and was not necessarily a permanent condition. Like people in other parts of the world, West Africans held war captives---including men,women and childeren---to be without rights and suitable for enslavement. In Islamic regions, masters had obligations to their slaves similar to those of a guardian for a ward and were responsible for their slaves' religious well-being. In non-Islamic regions, the children of slaves acquired legal protections, such as the right not to be sold away from the land they occupied.

Slaves who served either in the royal courts of a West African kingdom or in a kingdom's armies often exercised power over free people and could acquire property. Also, the slaves of peasant farmers often had standards of living similar to those of their masters. Slaves who worked under overseers in gangs on large estates were far less fortunate. However, even for such enslaved argicultural workers, the work and privileges accorded to the second and third generation become little different from those of free people. Regardless of their generation, slaves retained a low social status, but in many respects slavery in West Africa societies functioned as a means of assimilation
flitxu.jpg


By no means was it perfect, but I'm not necessarily opposed to this form of oppression...
 
Last edited:

bnm8907

All Star
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
2,685
Reputation
575
Daps
6,017
Reppin
NULL
I'll let you be the judge here's a passage from my African American studies book:



flitxu.jpg


By no means was it perfect, but I'm not necessarily opposed to this form of oppression...





I'm still on the fence anytime I here someone say slavery wasn't that bad or wasn't that much better than the common peasent or something like that. To me I just doesn't add up, that the average slave would be treated close to a normal citizen especially 100's of years ago. Again I wonder how common these examples are compared to generall population(like what %) had these conditions. Still to me saying it was less harsh may be a better way of putting it.



But at least you gave source so I can respect that.
 
Top