Rant about conspiracies, cabals and cults only to become a scientologist brehs.
the cucking and wife swapping makes sense
Rant about conspiracies, cabals and cults only to become a scientologist brehs.
Yea....imagine never having to go to war no more?Hey we were told COVID was a result of the Chinese eating bush meat. Turns out it was out of a lab churning out intentionally strengthened mutations of a virus that “escaped.”
I wonder why we got the bs cover story for years from respected scientists and why the hell the US was using Chinese labs to create COVID?
Claim you know shyt and joint a cac cult brehs.Rant about conspiracies, cabals and cults only to become a scientologist brehs.
Was Barbara Walters always a condescending bytch in her interviews?
Considering they say "aids" started out highly prevelant among the Ashkenazic jews likely due to sex abuse/chemical warfare,you should tread lightly pushing agendas like this. This is Robert Rayfords story,a young black teen and first aids victim.
Robert Rayford: America’s First AIDS Victim | Weekly View
"For lack of a more precise diagnosis, Robert’s death was attributed to loss of vitality, intractable fluid imbalance and lung disease. An autopsy revealed numerous other problems, including evidence of a rarely seen cancer called Kaposi’s sarcoma. In this case, “KS” manifested itself in the form of small purplish lesions discovered on Rayford’s left thigh and within his soft tissues. Kaposi’s sarcoma is a rare type of cancer most often found in elderly men of Mediterranean or Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry. Today, KS is taken as almost certain proof of AIDS, but in 1969, its significance was not understood."
This is an article from 1985,very suspicious
"A rare cancer, Kaposi's sarcoma, has changed rapidly in Africa and is now playing a disturbing role in the worldwide epidemic of AIDS. The cancer is believed to be striking young Africans at a significantly higher rate than ever before.
A relationship between AIDS and this new, more aggressive form of Kaposi's has become apparent since the development of an AIDS blood test two years ago. The test showed most victims of this new form of Kaposi's have evidence of exposure to the AIDS virus.
But why Kaposi's sarcoma is behaving in this new form is one of the many great unsolved puzzles surrounding acquired immune deficiency syndrome"
And heres one last note about the Robert Rayford story.
"There is one final theory about this first AIDS case in America that I will put forth for all of those who love to sink their teeth into a good conspiracy theory. In the book The River, a theory is advanced that Robert became vulnerable to the illnesses during the 1950s when the Army Chemical Corps conducted open-air chemical warfare tests in American cities. These included 35 aerosol releases in and around St. Louis. Most of those tests were conducted in low income neighborhoods, allegedly to minimize public resistance to such tests. One of those test areas was only half a block from the house in which Robert was born. These tests, conducted at the height of the Cold War, were explained away to local officials as being simple smoke screen experiments designed to shield U.S. cities in the event of a Soviet attack.
Decades later it was revealed that those tests involved zinc cadmium sulfide, a mixture of zinc sulfide and cadmium sulfide. It’s frequently referred to as a fluorescent particle because it glows in ultraviolet light. This quality makes it easy to trace for efficacy after the fact. However, cadmium is a highly toxic metal that is even more pernicious when spread through the air. Because the kidneys absorb it quickly, it is commonly associated with kidney failure, leads to cirrhosis of the liver and causes severe damage to the lungs and body cavities. All of these conditions were noted in Robert R’s report. Also, the effects can be passed by a mother to her fetus, so it’s entirely possible that Robert may have developed the seeds of his illness while still in the womb.
We’ll most likely never know the whole truth about the death of Robert Rayford — in part because we weren’t looking for the answers in the context of AIDS. We are content to label him as the first victim of a terrible epidemic that ran unchecked through our nation during the Moral Majority driven Reagan Revolution. Most of the knowledge gained about AIDS in the two decades between Robert Rayford’s death and ultimate diagnosis came from research and development, not from doctors and hospitals, but from the victims themselves. We Americans owe a great debt of gratitude for our understanding of this dread disease to those who have suffered, and often died, while searching for a cure — Robert Rayford, a mere medical footnote in history, among them."
Same old story
@Shadow123
antibodies don't prove HIV,and the p24 protein that one of the test test for,that protein I believe dissapears after a few weeks because the body is supposedly making these HIV antibodies.
Is a positive western blot proof of HIV infection? - PubMed - NCBI
It is currently accepted that a positive Western blot (WB) HIV antibody test is synonymous with HIV infection and the attendant risk of developing AIDS. In this communication we present a critical evaluation of the presently available data on HIV isolation and antibody testing. This evidence indicates that: (1) the antibody tests are not standardized; (2) the antibody tests are not reproducible; (3) the WB proteins (bands) which are considered to be encoded by the HIV genome and to be specific to HIV may not be encoded by the HIV genome and may in fact represent normal cellular proteins; (4) even if the proteins are specific to HIV, because no gold standard has been used to determine specificity, a positive WB may represent nothing more than cross-reactivity with non-HIV antibodies present in AIDS patients and those at risk. We conclude that the use of antibody tests as a diagnostic and epidemiological tool for HIV infection needs to be reappraised.