Sure, because they're so cool and edgy, but Sheam will have his 45453456646th good match in the last two years
Can any match be good if you're not entertained?
like if its just a bunch of rest holds and mat pounding?
like if its just a bunch of rest holds and mat pounding?
Can any match be good if you're not entertained?
Why, is he from there?
Who are your top ten workers in the E right now?
Sheamus gave Sandow his first legit match after squashing jobbers for weeks. Good back and forth. I don't see what'll be so "boring" about it. Unless you mean their characters but I thought it was about the wrestling?![]()
One of the main purposes of a wrestling match is to tell a story in the ring. If i have no interest in the charactor, or their charactor makes the match predictable or boring, that takes away from everything. To me, Sheamus is a prime example of that.
One of the main purposes of a wrestling match is to tell a story in the ring. If i have no interest in the charactor, or their charactor makes the match predictable or boring, that takes away from everything. To me, Sheamus is a prime example of that.
WWE isn't good at crafting stories and that's not the performers fault. Real talk, you're the #1 Orton stan and until recently he was having nothing but random matches with little build or story behind them. The man has no character really. He's not in a much better position than Sheamus IMO.