Will Chicago cheer for Sandow over Sheamus at Payback?

Will Chicago be Pro Sandow?

  • YES! YES! YES!

    Votes: 13 52.0%
  • NO! NO! NO!

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • Sheamus SUCKS!

    Votes: 11 44.0%

  • Total voters
    25
  • Poll closed .

I-Hate-You

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
30,817
Reputation
2,984
Daps
63,797
Sure, because they're so cool and edgy, but Sheam will have his 45453456646th good match in the last two years
 

Rarely-Wrong Liggins

Name another Liggins hot I'm just honest.
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
36,008
Reputation
12,648
Daps
138,465
Reppin
Staff
Sheamus gave Sandow his first legit match after squashing jobbers for weeks. Good back and forth. I don't see what'll be so "boring" about it. Unless you mean their characters but I thought it was about the wrestling? :ld:
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
70,157
Reputation
11,678
Daps
245,890
Reppin
206 & 734
Sheamus gave Sandow his first legit match after squashing jobbers for weeks. Good back and forth. I don't see what'll be so "boring" about it. Unless you mean their characters but I thought it was about the wrestling? :ld:

One of the main purposes of a wrestling match is to tell a story in the ring. If i have no interest in the charactor, or their charactor makes the match predictable or boring, that takes away from everything. To me, Sheamus is a prime example of that.
 

Rarely-Wrong Liggins

Name another Liggins hot I'm just honest.
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
36,008
Reputation
12,648
Daps
138,465
Reppin
Staff
One of the main purposes of a wrestling match is to tell a story in the ring. If i have no interest in the charactor, or their charactor makes the match predictable or boring, that takes away from everything. To me, Sheamus is a prime example of that.

WWE isn't good at crafting stories and that's not the performers fault. Real talk, you're the #1 Orton stan and until recently he was having nothing but random matches with little build or story behind them. The man has no character really. He's not in a much better position than Sheamus IMO.
 

MightyHealthy

said what he said
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
11,709
Reputation
1,829
Daps
23,292
Reppin
PUROGANG
I can't stand Sheamus's persona, but he's definitely very solid as a wrestler.

Even in matches where he will definitely win, he sells well and puts over his opponent.

That said, his persona needs retooling badly.
One of the main purposes of a wrestling match is to tell a story in the ring. If i have no interest in the charactor, or their charactor makes the match predictable or boring, that takes away from everything. To me, Sheamus is a prime example of that.
:rudy:

Orton has had a "charactor" as compelling as cardboard lately...

...all he's good for is for shots of cougars in the first few rows.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
70,157
Reputation
11,678
Daps
245,890
Reppin
206 & 734
WWE isn't good at crafting stories and that's not the performers fault. Real talk, you're the #1 Orton stan and until recently he was having nothing but random matches with little build or story behind them. The man has no character really. He's not in a much better position than Sheamus IMO.

I was referring to in the ring stories, which is different froma buildup. Working a body part...in match rivalry or acknowledging past history. Selling your charactor in match.... Orton vs cody from 3 or so weeks ago was better than any sheamus match in a year. If you dont remember that or didnt see it thats your fault.
 
Top