Will Black Americans breed themselves out of existence in the future?

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,825
Reputation
2,195
Daps
56,266
:umad:

and like I said the usa will absorb a 1st strike. But you can believe what you want. :yeshrug:
No, you're clearly believing what you want despite common sense and clear proof to the contrary. This is a quote from the information that you yourself were referencing: "if a state that we are engaged in conflict with is a nuclear-capable state, we do not necessarily intend to wait until that state uses nuclear weapons first—we reserve the right to use nuclear weapons first in a conflict whether its CW [chemical weapons], BW [biological weapons] or for that matter conventional [weapons]," he said.

Now how do you get "the USA has an absorb first policy" when it clearly refutes that claim? You're an idiot, that's how.
 

Red Shield

Global Domination
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
21,429
Reputation
2,501
Daps
47,632
Reppin
.0001%
No, you're clearly believing what you want despite common sense and clear proof to the contrary. This is a quote from the information that you yourself were referencing: "if a state that we are engaged in conflict with is a nuclear-capable state, we do not necessarily intend to wait until that state uses nuclear weapons first—we reserve the right to use nuclear weapons first in a conflict whether its CW [chemical weapons], BW [biological weapons] or for that matter conventional [weapons]," he said.

Now how do you get "the USA has an absorb first policy" when it clearly refutes that claim? You're an idiot, that's how.

No it doesn't refute the claim :yeshrug:
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,825
Reputation
2,195
Daps
56,266
No it doesn't refute the claim :yeshrug:
So a quote saying that we reserve the right to use nuclear weapons first on a country that is nuclear capable doesn't refute your claim that the USA has an "absorb first" policy?
 
Top