When you have a higher pop of people you have more voters=more political power
Again seems to be the go to word when I deal with you.
Again, political power is not something that is determined by the race someone decides to marry into. You can have people who stick with their own race on that ''Black folks need to pull themselves up by the bootstraps'', ''Maybe if they pulled their pants up and listened'' BS. You can have people in an interracial relationship who are the complete opposite politically.
You are making presumptions. Presumptions that have got people stabbed in the back by valuing only what's on the surface.
You have also taken a naive approach. Getting political power isn't as simple as farming a bunch of babies to build up numbers. In order to get the numbers to outweigh everyone else to the point of dominance, you would have to breed to the point that cannot be nurtured or sustained. What's actually needed is networking, wealth and negotiation. Things people forsake when they get drunk on talks of an insular community.
Soon latino well have the majority and watch how much more browner the US government gets.
Is that down to latin people sticking to their own, or latin countries being close to America? It's the latter.
The more financially successful black couples with business the more economically we can prosper, same thing with LeBron and his black friends from high school, LeBron became major=his friends started business black own =more black businesses and financial stable black families..
This is the way it's supposed to be but replace LeBron's friend with his own children.
This can't happen when most wealthy of us marry white and give the money right back to whites hands...
Again, you are making the assumption that a financially successful black couple will make moves to strengthen the economy for black people. You are also making the assumption that an interracial couple won't.
Again, if it is something you feel is important, go out, start a business and contribute to your economy. Before you expect something from people, think about what you are actually offering. That's some shyt that pisses me off. This isn't directed at you but the same bytches will happily wreck someone's marriage, laugh at a brother or sister getting humiliated, and those bytches will bemoan people for not supporting a community they are part of.
You want people contribute to the community, earn trust and loyalty.
If you are going to tell me to look forward, you should look forward when talking about the flow of money. If you're going to adopt that approach, consider the fact that every black business that generates money in America is putting money in Uncle Sam's hand.
Same with Byron allen, with his fight against discrimination in cable companies, if he died to today his white eife will not give a damn about continuing his lawsuit......why?
Because it's not her fight or her kids fight
, they'll the take the hundreds of millions they have already and live life and that cause will die.
You are presenting results that don't have a logical foundation. Unless he disinherited her and his kids, she would have a vested interest in pursuing the lawsuit (financial gain). You are also assuming his wife and kids don't love him or respect the hurdles he has had to deal with.
It would be better to argue that the benefit the decision could have for black people in the industry would suffer. Although the answer would just be another case of if it is important to you, valuable to you, pursue it. Nothing would stop a member of the community pursuing the issue beyond his death.
And Jewish people and do stick to their own for the most part, their is some c00ning but I can tell you that the richest Asians and Indians are not married to white women............can't be said about us...
Jewish people and Asian people marry out at a higher rate than black people. I think you are plagued by confirmation bias.