I think both of you missed the point and what I think many in the minority have been trying to say. Nipsey has his own cameras and his own footage that exist to serve as a record of the truth. The issue is that it's 2 years later and the world is still running with a storyline that's based off of footage that #1 doesn't even tell the story accurately and #2 was obtained and used by people and entities that only put it out for their own benefit and not for justice. TMZ knew that Nipsey had his own footage, yet they still rushed to the scene and got surveillance that was much worse than his own, to tell the story of his death for their own promotion.
If a dead man can't have his own surveillance used from his own store, to tell the story of his death accurately, because he has to await trial, while another entity gets to profit and be further promoted because they paid someone for weaker footage, it's really corrupt. This is why justice is not being served, even before the trial.
It sounds like people are okay with the lesser story being taken for face value 2 years later, while the evidence Nipsey himself made sure to secure is being treated as secondary, when it should be the other way around.